PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVRR vs. NVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FVRR vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVRR achieves a -54.81% return, which is significantly lower than NVT's 51.57% return.


FVRR

1D
-2.72%
1M
-18.15%
6M
-46.69%
YTD
-54.81%
1Y
-59.56%
3Y*
-32.86%
5Y*
-48.60%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-13.92%

NVT

1D
6.24%
1M
-3.72%
6M
37.41%
YTD
51.57%
1Y
97.47%
3Y*
42.62%
5Y*
39.10%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.18M$8.33M$8.87M
$373.02M$340.45M$350.68M

FVRR vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
-54.81%-37.72%16.57%-6.59%-74.37%-41.72%730.21%-9.62%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
51.57%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%8.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FVRR and NVT is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.21

The correlation between FVRR and NVT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FVRR:

$321.04M

NVT:

$24.88B

EPS

FVRR:

$0.82

NVT:

$3.63

PE Ratio

FVRR:

10.93

NVT:

42.34

PEG Ratio

FVRR:

0.05

NVT:

1.02

PS Ratio

FVRR:

0.78

NVT:

5.23

PB Ratio

FVRR:

0.75

NVT:

6.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

FVRR:

$418.35M

NVT:

$4.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FVRR:

$343.03M

NVT:

$1.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

FVRR:

$67.55M

NVT:

$1.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVRR vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVRR
FVRR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FVRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVRR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FVRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVRR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVRR vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVRRNVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.34

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.90

3.57

-4.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

13.66

-15.02

FVRR vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVRR Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVRR and NVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVRR vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVRR drawdown since its inception was -97.24%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVRR and NVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVRRNVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.24%

-56.18%

-41.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.52%

-27.42%

-39.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.81%

-46.67%

-28.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.18%

-46.67%

-49.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.24%

-16.44%

-80.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.21%

-11.83%

-56.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.69%

7.16%

+36.53%

Volatility

FVRR vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

Fiverr International Ltd. (FVRR) has a higher volatility of 26.74% compared to nVent Electric plc (NVT) at 16.96%. This indicates that FVRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVRRNVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.74%

16.96%

+9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.39%

36.03%

+11.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.13%

45.95%

+8.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.83%

37.09%

+27.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

71.15%

38.93%

+32.22%

Dividends

FVRR vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

FVRR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FVRR
Fiverr International Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.54%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%

Financials

FVRR vs. NVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fiverr International Ltd. and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FVRR vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fiverr International Ltd. and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FVRR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 79.93M and revenue of 97.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.7%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 558.00M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.9%.

FVRR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported an operating income of 4.38M and revenue of 97.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 300.70M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.4%.

FVRR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Fiverr International Ltd. reported a net income of 4.47M and revenue of 97.78M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 215.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FVRR and NVT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVRR has higher volatility (26.74%) compared to NVT (16.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVRR dropped -97.24% vs NVT's -56.18%.

NVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVRR and NVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer