PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVEM.DE achieves a 25.43% return, which is significantly higher than VFEM.DE's 12.66% return.


FVEM.DE

1D
-1.33%
1M
4.58%
YTD
25.43%
6M
27.21%
1Y
47.18%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
10Y*

VFEM.DE

1D
-0.53%
1M
2.23%
YTD
12.66%
6M
13.06%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FVEM.DE and VFEM.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023

0.92

The correlation between FVEM.DE and VFEM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVEM.DE
FVEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

VFEM.DE
VFEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VFEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
VFEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVEM.DEVFEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.32

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

3.11

+1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.79

10.36

+6.43

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the VFEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVEM.DE and VFEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVEM.DEVFEM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.80

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.36

+0.71

Drawdowns

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum VFEM.DE drawdown of -31.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVEM.DE and VFEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVEM.DEVFEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-31.59%

+12.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-8.49%

-2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.76%

-18.56%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-1.73%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-8.24%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.55%

+0.25%

Volatility

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FVEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE) at 5.44%. This indicates that FVEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVEM.DEVFEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.26%

5.44%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

11.70%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

14.69%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

15.93%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

18.20%

-2.16%

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVEM.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VFEM.DE's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FVEM.DE vs. VFEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

FVEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVEM.DE
Franklin MSCI Emerging Markets Paris Aligned Climate UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFEM.DE
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing
2.04%2.39%2.28%2.66%3.38%2.26%1.93%2.32%2.79%0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FVEM.DE and VFEM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FVEM.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FVEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VFEM.DE.

FVEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Climate Paris Aligned, while VFEM.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FVEM.DE and 0.22% for VFEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVEM.DE and VFEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer