VFEM.DE vs. VEVE.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L).
VFEM.DE and VEVE.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VFEM.DE is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI EM NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2012. VEVE.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014. Both VFEM.DE and VEVE.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: VFEM.DE or VEVE.L.
Key characteristics
| VFEM.DE | VEVE.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.72% | 11.80% |
| 1Y Return | 8.80% | 16.68% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.14% | 8.98% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.67% | 11.37% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.83 | 1.66 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.56% | 10.35% |
| Max Drawdown | -31.59% | -25.52% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.57% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFEM.DE and VEVE.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
VFEM.DE vs. VEVE.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, VFEM.DE achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than VEVE.L's 11.80% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VFEM.DE vs. VEVE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFEM.DE has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VEVE.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
VFEM.DE vs. VEVE.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
VFEM.DE vs. VEVE.L - Dividend Comparison
VFEM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than VEVE.L's 1.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFEM.DE Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing | 2.49% | 2.66% | 3.38% | 2.26% | 1.93% | 2.32% | 2.79% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.25% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 1.45% | 1.64% | 1.96% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 1.85% | 2.04% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
VFEM.DE vs. VEVE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.59%, which is greater than VEVE.L's maximum drawdown of -25.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFEM.DE and VEVE.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
VFEM.DE vs. VEVE.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets UCITS ETF Distributing (VFEM.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Distributing (VEVE.L) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.