PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVCAX vs. HIMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVCAX vs. HIMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVCAX achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than HIMFX's 2.18% return.


FVCAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.81%
YTD
2.05%
6M
2.66%
1Y
7.99%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
2.64%

HIMFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.67%
YTD
2.18%
6M
2.76%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
5.97%
5Y*
1.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVCAX vs. HIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVCAX
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class
2.05%4.77%4.98%4.66%-11.86%3.97%4.64%10.29%1.15%6.47%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
2.18%4.69%6.23%7.89%-12.36%5.60%4.74%8.92%1.91%8.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FVCAX and HIMFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.89

The correlation between FVCAX and HIMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVCAX vs. HIMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVCAX
FVCAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FVCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HIMFX
HIMFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HIMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HIMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVCAX vs. HIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVCAXHIMFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.37

2.68

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.85

4.38

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.64

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

3.09

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.88

11.11

-1.23

FVCAX vs. HIMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the HIMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVCAX and HIMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVCAXHIMFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.68

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.37

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.85

+0.02

Drawdowns

FVCAX vs. HIMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVCAX drawdown since its inception was -24.06%, which is greater than HIMFX's maximum drawdown of -17.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVCAX and HIMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVCAXHIMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.06%

-17.57%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-2.76%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.01%

-6.17%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.59%

-17.57%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.13%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.57%

-3.17%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.77%

+0.04%

Volatility

FVCAX vs. HIMFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3 (HIMFX) at 1.10%. This indicates that FVCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVCAXHIMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.10%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

2.25%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25%

3.08%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

4.82%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

4.60%

+0.24%

FVCAX vs. HIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVCAX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HIMFX's 0.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVCAX vs. HIMFX - Dividend Comparison

FVCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than HIMFX's 4.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVCAX
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class
4.40%5.82%4.87%3.46%3.65%3.10%3.30%4.05%3.85%3.45%3.86%4.06%
HIMFX
American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-3
4.24%4.32%3.83%3.71%2.80%3.54%3.73%3.49%3.99%3.61%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVCAX and HIMFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FVCAX has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to HIMFX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVCAX dropped -24.06% vs HIMFX's -17.57%.

HIMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVCAX and HIMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer