PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FVCAX vs. FFACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FVCAX vs. FFACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FVCAX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than FFACX's 6.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FVCAX has underperformed FFACX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while FFACX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.44% annualized return.


FVCAX

1D
-0.31%
1M
-2.04%
6M
0.48%
YTD
1.06%
1Y
6.49%
3Y*
4.56%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
2.29%
ALL TIME*
3.97%

FFACX

1D
1.31%
1M
-0.22%
6M
4.66%
YTD
6.82%
1Y
15.17%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
6.44%
ALL TIME*
5.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FVCAX vs. FFACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FVCAX
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class
1.06%4.77%4.98%4.66%-11.86%3.97%4.64%10.29%1.15%6.87%
FFACX
Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C
6.82%15.09%12.06%11.99%-12.43%10.89%0.71%16.90%-10.54%10.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FVCAX and FFACX is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2006

-0.10

The correlation between FVCAX and FFACX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FVCAX vs. FFACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FVCAX
FVCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FVCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FFACX
FFACX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FFACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFACX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FFACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFACX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FVCAX vs. FFACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) and Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FVCAXFFACXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.27

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.08

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

8.93

+0.61

FVCAX vs. FFACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the FFACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVCAX and FFACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FVCAX vs. FFACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVCAX drawdown since its inception was -24.06%, smaller than the maximum FFACX drawdown of -53.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVCAX and FFACX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVCAXFFACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.06%

-53.66%

+29.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-6.75%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.15%

-10.99%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.59%

-18.76%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.59%

-30.23%

+12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.04%

-1.11%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-7.92%

+4.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.57%

-0.77%

Volatility

FVCAX vs. FFACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) is 0.99%, while Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C (FFACX) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that FVCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVCAXFFACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

2.73%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

7.93%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

9.44%

-6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.73%

10.13%

-5.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

11.32%

-6.48%

FVCAX vs. FFACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVCAX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FFACX's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

FVCAX vs. FFACX - Dividend Comparison

FVCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than FFACX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFACX
Franklin Global Allocation Fund Class C
4.46%4.52%0.39%0.90%3.57%0.45%6.72%2.24%2.38%2.21%1.48%2.17%
FVCAX
Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class
4.11%5.82%4.87%3.46%3.65%3.10%3.30%4.05%3.85%3.45%3.86%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FVCAX and FFACX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFACX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to FVCAX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVCAX dropped -24.06% vs FFACX's -53.66%.

FVCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FVCAX and FFACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer