FVCAX vs. AHMFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FVCAX (Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class) and AHMFX (American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVCAX returned 2.64%/yr vs 3.46%/yr for AHMFX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FVCAX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for AHMFX.

Performance

FVCAX vs. AHMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FVCAX having a 2.05% return and AHMFX slightly higher at 2.13%. Over the past 10 years, FVCAX has underperformed AHMFX with an annualized return of 2.64%, while AHMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.46% annualized return.

FVCAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: 2.66%
• 1Y: 7.99%
• 3Y*: 5.01%
• 5Y*: 0.98%
• 10Y*: 2.64%

AHMFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 2.13%
• 6M: 2.70%
• 1Y: 8.36%
• 3Y*: 6.33%
• 5Y*: 1.87%
• 10Y*: 3.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FVCAX vs. AHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FVCAX Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class	2.05%	4.77%	4.98%	4.66%	-11.86%	3.97%	4.64%	10.29%	1.15%	6.87%
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	2.13%	6.03%	6.45%	7.04%	-12.44%	5.49%	4.61%	9.12%	1.80%	9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FVCAX and AHMFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2009	0.84

The correlation between FVCAX and AHMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FVCAX vs. AHMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FVCAX

FVCAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FVCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FVCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FVCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FVCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FVCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

AHMFX

AHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 75
AHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FVCAX vs. AHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) and American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FVCAX	AHMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.37	2.65	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	4.32	-0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.63	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	3.04	-0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.88	10.89	-1.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FVCAX vs. AHMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FVCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the AHMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FVCAX and AHMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FVCAX	AHMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37	2.65	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.39	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.76	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	1.54	-0.67

Drawdowns

FVCAX vs. AHMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FVCAX drawdown since its inception was -24.06%, which is greater than AHMFX's maximum drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVCAX and AHMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FVCAX	AHMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.06%	-17.65%	-6.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-2.76%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.01%	-6.20%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.59%	-17.65%	+0.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.59%	-17.65%	+0.06%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-0.15%	+0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.57%	-2.37%	-1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	0.77%	+0.04%

Volatility

FVCAX vs. AHMFX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class (FVCAX) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2 (AHMFX) at 1.10%. This indicates that FVCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FVCAX	AHMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.10%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.38%	2.24%	+0.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.25%	3.06%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.71%	4.86%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.84%	4.55%	+0.29%

FVCAX vs. AHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FVCAX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AHMFX's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

FVCAX vs. AHMFX - Dividend Comparison

FVCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than AHMFX's 4.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AHMFX American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund Class F-2	4.13%	5.58%	4.04%	2.97%	2.71%	3.44%	3.60%	3.68%	3.88%	4.19%	3.74%	4.19%
FVCAX Franklin California High Yield Municipal Fund Advisor Class	4.40%	5.82%	4.87%	3.46%	3.65%	3.10%	3.30%	4.05%	3.85%	3.45%	3.86%	4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FVCAX and AHMFX in my portfolio?

FVCAX and AHMFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FVCAX or AHMFX?

FVCAX has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to AHMFX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVCAX dropped -24.06% vs AHMFX's -17.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.