FVC vs. ROBT
FVC (First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVC is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FVC returned 4.98%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for ROBT. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVC charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.
Performance
FVC vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVC achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 14.22% return.
FVC
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- 11.30%
- YTD
- 17.30%
- 6M
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 4.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.62%
ROBT
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
FVC vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | 17.30% | 2.12% | 12.43% | -4.59% | -6.03% | 21.92% | 12.71% | 19.28% | -13.38% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 14.22% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 34.28% | -13.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVC and ROBT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FVC and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
FVC vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FVC
ROBT
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FVC
ROBT
Industrials
FVC
ROBT
Financial Services
FVC
ROBT
Healthcare
FVC
ROBT
Energy
FVC
ROBT
Consumer Cyclical
FVC
ROBT
Communication Services
FVC
ROBT
Real Estate
FVC
ROBT
-
Basic Materials
FVC
-
ROBT
-
Consumer Defensive
FVC
-
ROBT
Utilities
FVC
-
ROBT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVC vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
FVC
ROBT
FVC vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FVC | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.22 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.42 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 4.09 | +2.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FVC | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.32 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.09 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.35 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
FVC vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVC and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVC | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -44.47% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.32% | -21.66% | +8.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.75% | -27.68% | +12.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.62% | -43.26% | +20.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.73% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -15.97% | +8.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 7.53% | -4.15% |
Volatility
FVC vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) is 4.29%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that FVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVC | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 6.46% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.37% | 17.51% | -5.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 23.32% | -10.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 25.18% | -8.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.61% | 25.48% | -7.87% |
FVC vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVC vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
FVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | 1.92% | 2.57% | 0.78% | 1.89% | 1.50% | 0.09% | 0.21% | 1.07% | 0.24% | 0.63% | 0.67% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVC and ROBT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to FVC (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVC dropped -30.96% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 5-year performance, FVC leads with 4.98% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FVC has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FVC has performed better with a 4.98% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FVC.
FVC has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
FVC is categorized as Hedge Fund, while ROBT is Technology Equities. FVC tracks Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FVC and 0.65% for ROBT.
FVC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVC and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer