FVC vs. SPMO
FVC (First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FVC is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVC returned 8.42%/yr vs 21.40%/yr for SPMO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVC charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
FVC vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVC achieves a 15.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 34.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FVC has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 8.42%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.40% annualized return.
FVC
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 9.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
SPMO
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- 13.70%
- YTD
- 34.39%
- 6M
- 36.57%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 43.78%
- 5Y*
- 24.48%
- 10Y*
- 21.40%
FVC vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | 15.43% | 2.12% | 12.43% | -4.59% | -6.03% | 21.92% | 12.71% | 19.28% | -8.60% | 19.74% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 34.39% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVC and SPMO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FVC and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVC vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
FVC
SPMO
FVC vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.46 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 3.99 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | 15.09 | -8.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVC vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVC and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -30.95% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.32% | -12.70% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.75% | -20.13% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.62% | -22.74% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | -30.95% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | 0.00% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.04% | -4.59% | -2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.35% | +0.07% |
Volatility
FVC vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) is 6.45%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that FVC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVC | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 10.61% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.58% | 17.21% | -3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 19.99% | -5.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 19.76% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 20.54% | -2.85% |
FVC vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVC vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
FVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than SPMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | 1.95% | 2.57% | 0.78% | 1.89% | 1.50% | 0.09% | 0.21% | 1.07% | 0.24% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.63% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVC and SPMO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to FVC (6.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVC dropped -30.96% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 21.40% vs 8.42% for FVC. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FVC has been the lower-risk option at 6.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 21.40% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FVC.
FVC has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.63% for SPMO.
FVC is categorized as Hedge Fund, while SPMO is Momentum. FVC tracks Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus Five Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FVC and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVC and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer