FVC vs. RLY
FVC (First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF) and RLY (SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds. FVC is passively managed, while RLY is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FVC returned 8.56%/yr vs 7.97%/yr for RLY. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FVC charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for RLY.
Performance
FVC vs. RLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FVC achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly higher than RLY's 10.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FVC has outperformed RLY with an annualized return of 8.56%, while RLY has yielded a comparatively lower 7.97% annualized return.
FVC
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 14.86%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 20.47%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 4.32%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
RLY
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.97%
FVC vs. RLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | 14.86% | 2.12% | 12.43% | -4.59% | -6.03% | 21.92% | 12.71% | 19.28% | -8.60% | 19.74% |
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 10.09% | 20.26% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 7.86% | 22.85% | -0.59% | 15.63% | -11.72% | 10.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FVC and RLY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2016 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FVC and RLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FVC vs. RLY — Risk / Return Rank
FVC
RLY
FVC vs. RLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) and SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FVC | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.39 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 3.00 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 14.99 | -8.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FVC vs. RLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FVC drawdown since its inception was -30.96%, smaller than the maximum RLY drawdown of -37.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FVC and RLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FVC | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.96% | -37.75% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.32% | -7.51% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.75% | -10.08% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.62% | -18.94% | -3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.96% | -34.17% | +3.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -7.51% | +5.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -9.43% | +2.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 1.50% | +1.92% |
Volatility
FVC vs. RLY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (FVC) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) at 3.28%. This indicates that FVC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FVC | RLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 3.28% | +3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 8.55% | +5.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 10.55% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.49% | 13.54% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 13.81% | +3.87% |
FVC vs. RLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FVC has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than RLY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FVC vs. RLY - Dividend Comparison
FVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than RLY's 3.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FVC First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF | 1.96% | 2.57% | 0.78% | 1.89% | 1.50% | 0.09% | 0.21% | 1.07% | 0.24% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.00% |
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF | 3.05% | 3.24% | 3.31% | 3.71% | 5.66% | 12.15% | 2.16% | 3.45% | 2.76% | 1.85% | 2.07% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FVC and RLY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FVC has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to RLY (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FVC dropped -30.96% vs RLY's -37.75%.
On 10-year performance, FVC leads with 8.56% vs 7.97% for RLY. On fees, RLY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RLY has been the lower-risk option at 3.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FVC has performed better with a 8.56% return vs 7.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RLY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for FVC.
RLY has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.96% for FVC.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for FVC and 0.50% for RLY.
RLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FVC and RLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer