FV vs. IUSV
FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) and IUSV (iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while IUSV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FV returned 13.38%/yr vs 12.30%/yr for IUSV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FV charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSV.
Performance
FV vs. IUSV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 15.21% return, which is significantly higher than IUSV's 7.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FV has outperformed IUSV with an annualized return of 13.38%, while IUSV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.30% annualized return.
FV
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 13.75%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
IUSV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 7.71%
- 6M
- 7.04%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
FV vs. IUSV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 15.21% | 7.23% | 14.73% | 11.34% | -3.93% | 21.63% | 28.36% | 25.73% | -8.27% | 19.97% |
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 7.71% | 12.85% | 12.18% | 21.73% | -5.40% | 25.22% | 1.56% | 31.47% | -9.21% | 15.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FV and IUSV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FV and IUSV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
FV vs. IUSV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FV
IUSV
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
FV
IUSV
Technology
FV
IUSV
Healthcare
FV
IUSV
Financial Services
FV
IUSV
Industrials
FV
IUSV
Consumer Cyclical
FV
IUSV
Communication Services
FV
IUSV
Real Estate
FV
IUSV
Basic Materials
FV
-
IUSV
Consumer Defensive
FV
-
IUSV
Utilities
FV
-
IUSV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FV vs. IUSV — Risk / Return Rank
FV
IUSV
FV vs. IUSV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FV | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 3.18 | -1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.14 | 12.08 | -4.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FV vs. IUSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum IUSV drawdown of -56.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and IUSV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FV | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -56.88% | +22.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -6.36% | -7.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.08% | -17.76% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.08% | -17.95% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -37.54% | +3.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.55% | -1.31% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -6.28% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 1.67% | +1.94% |
Volatility
FV vs. IUSV - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF (IUSV) at 3.03%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FV | IUSV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 3.03% | +3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 7.46% | +6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 10.11% | +6.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.92% | 14.53% | +6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 17.04% | +4.43% |
FV vs. IUSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
FV vs. IUSV - Dividend Comparison
FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than IUSV's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.14% |
IUSV iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF | 1.70% | 1.78% | 2.15% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 1.87% | 2.40% | 2.19% | 2.67% | 1.93% | 4.44% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FV and IUSV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FV has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to IUSV (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs IUSV's -56.88%.
On 10-year performance, FV leads with 13.38% vs 12.30% for IUSV. On fees, IUSV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FV has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.
IUSV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.53% for FV.
FV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IUSV is Large Cap Value Equities. FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while IUSV tracks S&P 900 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.04% for IUSV.
IUSV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FV and IUSV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer