PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FV vs. DLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FV vs. DLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FV has outperformed DLN with an annualized return of 13.45%, while DLN has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.


FV

1D
1.48%
1M
11.69%
YTD
18.14%
6M
18.84%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
13.45%

DLN

1D
-0.51%
1M
2.93%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.96%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.35%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FV vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
18.14%7.23%14.73%11.34%-3.93%21.63%28.36%25.73%-8.27%19.97%
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
9.93%15.53%19.66%9.95%-3.78%25.60%4.59%28.91%-5.82%18.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FV and DLN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2014

0.78

The correlation between FV and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

FV vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FV
DLN

Technology

29.0%
20.1%

Industrials

27.8%
7.9%

Financial Services

19.8%
18.0%

Healthcare

19.4%
12.6%

Energy

17.5%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
5.0%

Communication Services

6.3%
7.8%

Real Estate

0.7%
4.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.3%

Utilities

-

5.9%

Technology

FV
29.0%
DLN
20.1%

Industrials

FV
27.8%
DLN
7.9%

Financial Services

FV
19.8%
DLN
18.0%

Healthcare

FV
19.4%
DLN
12.6%

Energy

FV
17.5%
DLN
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FV
6.4%
DLN
5.0%

Communication Services

FV
6.3%
DLN
7.8%

Real Estate

FV
0.7%
DLN
4.0%

Basic Materials

FV

-

DLN
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

FV

-

DLN
9.3%

Utilities

FV

-

DLN
5.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FV vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FV
FV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DLN
DLN Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DLN Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DLN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FV vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FVDLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.46

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.69

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.12

15.59

-7.47

FV vs. DLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FV Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the DLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FV and DLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FVDLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.53

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.93

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.79

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Drawdowns

FV vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and DLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FVDLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.04%

-57.84%

+23.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.45%

-6.10%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.08%

-13.71%

-9.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-16.26%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.04%

-35.82%

+1.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.51%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-7.52%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

1.44%

+2.13%

Volatility

FV vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FVDLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

2.17%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

6.77%

+5.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

8.87%

+6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

13.26%

+7.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

16.16%

+5.26%

FV vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

FV vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison

FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DLN
WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF
1.79%1.90%2.00%2.43%2.53%2.01%2.66%2.51%2.90%2.33%2.64%2.80%
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
0.52%0.63%0.14%0.47%1.38%0.11%0.06%0.56%0.19%0.67%0.95%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FV and DLN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs DLN's -57.84%.

On 10-year performance, FV leads with 13.45% vs 12.68% for DLN. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FV has performed better with a 13.45% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.52% for FV.

FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.28% for DLN.

DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FV and DLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer