FV vs. DGRO
FV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FV tracks the Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index while DGRO tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FV returned 13.39%/yr vs 13.64%/yr for DGRO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FV charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.
Performance
FV vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FV achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 9.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FV having a 13.39% annualized return and DGRO not far ahead at 13.64%.
FV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 13.53%
- 1Y
- 24.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
DGRO
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
FV vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 15.29% | 7.23% | 14.73% | 11.34% | -3.93% | 21.63% | 28.36% | 25.73% | -8.27% | 19.97% |
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 9.37% | 15.69% | 16.62% | 10.47% | -7.91% | 26.64% | 9.50% | 29.87% | -2.38% | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FV and DGRO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FV and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
FV vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FV
DGRO
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Energy
FV
DGRO
Technology
FV
DGRO
Healthcare
FV
DGRO
Financial Services
FV
DGRO
Industrials
FV
DGRO
Consumer Cyclical
FV
DGRO
Communication Services
FV
DGRO
Real Estate
FV
DGRO
-
Basic Materials
FV
-
DGRO
Consumer Defensive
FV
-
DGRO
Utilities
FV
-
DGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FV vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank
FV
DGRO
FV vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 3.34 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | 12.88 | -6.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FV vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FV drawdown since its inception was -34.04%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FV and DGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.04% | -35.10% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.45% | -6.47% | -6.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.08% | -14.03% | -9.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.08% | -19.31% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.04% | -35.10% | +1.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -0.74% | -1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -3.43% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.61% | 1.67% | +1.94% |
Volatility
FV vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.48%. This indicates that FV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FV | DGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 2.48% | +4.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 6.94% | +6.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.16% | 9.51% | +6.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 13.79% | +7.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.47% | 16.59% | +4.88% |
FV vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FV has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FV vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison
FV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | 1.96% | 2.09% | 2.26% | 2.45% | 2.34% | 1.93% | 2.30% | 2.21% | 2.44% | 2.03% | 2.27% | 2.52% |
FV First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.14% | 0.47% | 1.38% | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.56% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FV and DGRO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FV has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to DGRO (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FV dropped -34.04% vs DGRO's -35.10%.
On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.64% vs 13.39% for FV. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.64% return vs 13.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.
DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.53% for FV.
FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for FV and 0.08% for DGRO.
DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FV and DGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer