FUTY vs. XRMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI).
FUTY and XRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FUTY is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. XRMI is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Risk Managed Income Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both FUTY and XRMI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FUTY vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FUTY vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 8.19% | 16.40% | 23.20% | -7.46% | 1.12% | 6.54% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | -2.13% | 4.60% | 15.18% | 4.22% | -14.06% | 2.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's -2.13% return.
FUTY
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
XRMI
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -3.63%
- YTD
- -2.13%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 4.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FUTY vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FUTY vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank
FUTY
XRMI
FUTY vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FUTY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 0.62 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 0.89 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 0.80 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 2.72 | +2.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FUTY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 0.62 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.26 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTY and XRMI is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FUTY vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison
FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than XRMI's 12.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.49% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.78% | 12.35% | 11.86% | 12.62% | 12.84% | 2.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FUTY vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than XRMI's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and XRMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.44% | -15.31% | -21.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -5.02% | -3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -3.86% | +1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -6.10% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 1.47% | +2.28% |
Volatility
FUTY vs. XRMI - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI) at 2.68%. This indicates that FUTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FUTY | XRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.03% | 2.68% | +2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.15% | 4.51% | +5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 6.88% | +8.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 6.99% | +9.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 6.99% | +12.00% |