PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTY vs. RSPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUTY vs. RSPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 3.16% return, which is significantly lower than RSPU's 4.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FUTY having a 9.03% annualized return and RSPU not far ahead at 9.39%.


FUTY

1D
-0.60%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
3.16%
6M
1.20%
1Y
9.52%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
9.03%

RSPU

1D
-0.25%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
4.83%
6M
3.78%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
9.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTY vs. RSPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
3.16%16.40%23.20%-7.46%1.12%17.53%-0.80%24.89%4.36%12.52%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
4.83%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTY and RSPU is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013

0.97

The correlation between FUTY and RSPU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

FUTY vs. RSPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUTY
RSPU

Utilities

99.2%
100.0%

Energy

0.5%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

FUTY
99.2%
RSPU
100.0%

Energy

FUTY
0.5%
RSPU

-

Industrials

FUTY
0.2%
RSPU

-

Basic Materials

FUTY

-

RSPU

-

Communication Services

FUTY

-

RSPU

-

Consumer Cyclical

FUTY

-

RSPU

-

Consumer Defensive

FUTY

-

RSPU

-

Financial Services

FUTY

-

RSPU

-

Healthcare

FUTY

-

RSPU

-

Real Estate

FUTY

-

RSPU

-

Technology

FUTY

-

RSPU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTY vs. RSPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTY
FUTY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
FUTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTY vs. RSPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUTYRSPUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

0.79

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

1.14

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.14

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.30

-0.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.41

3.04

-0.63

FUTY vs. RSPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is comparable to the RSPU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTY and RSPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUTYRSPUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

0.79

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.64

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.49

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.47

+0.09

Drawdowns

FUTY vs. RSPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, smaller than the maximum RSPU drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and RSPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTYRSPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.44%

-48.08%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-8.46%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.35%

-16.27%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.11%

-21.86%

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.44%

-36.85%

+0.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.28%

-7.15%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-7.85%

+1.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

3.63%

+0.34%

Volatility

FUTY vs. RSPU - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) have volatilities of 5.45% and 5.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTYRSPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

5.21%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

10.93%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.33%

13.98%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.08%

16.92%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

19.09%

-0.04%

FUTY vs. RSPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPU's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUTY vs. RSPU - Dividend Comparison

FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than RSPU's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUTY
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF
2.61%2.67%2.96%3.31%2.72%2.70%3.07%2.82%3.11%3.03%3.35%4.33%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.54%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FUTY and RSPU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FUTY has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to RSPU (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs RSPU's -48.08%.

On 10-year performance, RSPU leads with 9.39% vs 9.03% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPU has performed better with a 9.39% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

FUTY has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.54% for RSPU.

FUTY tracks MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.40% for RSPU.

RSPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTY and RSPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer