FUTY vs. BILT
FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds. FUTY is passively managed, while BILT is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FUTY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
FUTY vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 6.83% return, which is significantly lower than BILT's 13.47% return.
FUTY
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.83%
- 6M
- 6.88%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.27%
BILT
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 13.47%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FUTY vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 6.83% | 1.86% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 13.47% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTY and BILT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTY vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
FUTY
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FUTY vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUTY | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.37 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTY vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTY | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.44% | -5.38% | -31.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -1.42% | -2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.03% | -1.44% | -4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.18% | — | — |
Volatility
FUTY vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTY | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 10.28% | +4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 10.28% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 10.28% | +8.80% |
FUTY vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUTY vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than BILT's 5.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.74% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.60% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTY and BILT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 2.60% for FUTY.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.60% for BILT.
Find the right allocation for FUTY and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer