FUTY vs. BILT
FUTY (Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF) and BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FUTY is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Utilities Index, while BILT is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by iShares. FUTY is passively managed, while BILT is actively managed. Over the past year, FUTY returned 6.08% vs 17.98% for BILT. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FUTY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BILT.
Performance
FUTY vs. BILT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTY achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than BILT's 14.30% return.
FUTY
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 13.47%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.02%
BILT
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.38M | $1.70M | $1.65M | |
| $18.62M | $18.35M | $18.70M |
FUTY vs. BILT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 4.79% | 1.86% |
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 14.30% | 4.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTY and BILT is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FUTY and BILT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTY vs. BILT — Risk / Return Rank
FUTY
BILT
FUTY vs. BILT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) and iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUTY | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.33 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.69 | 3.52 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 10.60 | -9.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTY vs. BILT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTY drawdown since its inception was -36.44%, which is greater than BILT's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTY and BILT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTY | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.44% | -5.38% | -31.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -5.38% | -3.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -2.25% | -3.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.00% | -1.36% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.33% | 1.78% | +2.55% |
Volatility
FUTY vs. BILT - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF (FUTY) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) at 3.10%. This indicates that FUTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BILT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTY | BILT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 3.10% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 8.44% | +3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 10.31% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 10.31% | +6.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 10.31% | +8.78% |
FUTY vs. BILT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUTY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BILT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUTY vs. BILT - Dividend Comparison
FUTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than BILT's 5.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.70% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FUTY Fidelity MSCI Utilities Index ETF | 2.65% | 2.67% | 2.96% | 3.31% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 2.82% | 3.11% | 3.03% | 3.35% | 4.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTY and BILT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FUTY has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to BILT (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTY dropped -36.44% vs BILT's -5.38%.
On 1-year performance, BILT leads with 17.98% vs 6.08% for FUTY. On fees, FUTY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, BILT has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BILT has performed better with a 17.98% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FUTY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 2.65% for FUTY.
FUTY is categorized as Utilities Equities, while BILT is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FUTY and 0.60% for BILT.
BILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FUTY and BILT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer