PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUTU vs. ADMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FUTU vs. ADMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUTU achieves a -39.65% return, which is significantly higher than ADMA's -54.99% return.


FUTU

1D
2.10%
1M
-31.67%
YTD
-39.65%
6M
-42.20%
1Y
-13.16%
3Y*
34.68%
5Y*
-6.95%
10Y*

ADMA

1D
-1.32%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
-54.99%
6M
-58.49%
1Y
-61.99%
3Y*
27.09%
5Y*
35.16%
10Y*
1.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTU vs. ADMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
-39.65%105.29%49.87%34.39%-6.12%-5.36%343.31%-30.08%
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
-54.99%6.36%279.42%16.49%175.18%-27.69%-51.25%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTU and ADMA is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.23

The correlation between FUTU and ADMA shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FUTU:

$13.82B

ADMA:

$1.97B

EPS

FUTU:

HK$71.05

ADMA:

$0.68

PE Ratio

FUTU:

10.76

ADMA:

12.13

PS Ratio

FUTU:

4.50

ADMA:

3.93

PB Ratio

FUTU:

2.63

ADMA:

5.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$24.01B

ADMA:

$509.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$21.07B

ADMA:

$312.42M

EBITDA (TTM)

FUTU:

HK$14.81B

ADMA:

$218.74M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUTU vs. ADMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUTU
FUTU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FUTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUTU Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FUTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ADMA
ADMA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ADMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADMA Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ADMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADMA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUTU vs. ADMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) and ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUTUADMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

0.76

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.98

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.64

-1.95

+1.31

FUTU vs. ADMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the ADMA Sharpe Ratio of -1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUTU and ADMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUTU vs. ADMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUTU drawdown since its inception was -87.23%, roughly equal to the maximum ADMA drawdown of -91.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTU and ADMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUTUADMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.23%

-91.28%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.18%

-63.48%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.18%

-68.99%

+14.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.42%

-68.99%

-17.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.21%

-66.50%

+16.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.53%

-53.05%

+5.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.61%

33.85%

-13.24%

Volatility

FUTU vs. ADMA - Volatility Comparison

Futu Holdings Limited (FUTU) has a higher volatility of 39.14% compared to ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) at 9.74%. This indicates that FUTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUTUADMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

39.14%

9.74%

+29.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.00%

45.54%

+5.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.08%

54.60%

+8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.75%

59.47%

+13.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.16%

69.03%

+6.13%

Dividends

FUTU vs. ADMA - Dividend Comparison

FUTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while ADMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ADMA
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FUTU
Futu Holdings Limited
2.67%0.00%2.50%

Financials

FUTU vs. ADMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Futu Holdings Limited and ADMA Biologics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.86B
114.49M
(FUTU) Total Revenue
(ADMA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. FUTU values in HKD, ADMA values in USD

FUTU vs. ADMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Futu Holdings Limited and ADMA Biologics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
87.2%
70.5%
Portfolio components
FUTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 5.11B and revenue of 5.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.2%.

ADMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 80.75M and revenue of 114.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.5%.

FUTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 3.53B and revenue of 5.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.

ADMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported an operating income of 58.27M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.9%.

FUTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Futu Holdings Limited reported a net income of 850.55M and revenue of 5.86B, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.

ADMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ADMA Biologics, Inc. reported a net income of 45.33M and revenue of 114.49M, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FUTU and ADMA have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FUTU has higher volatility (39.14%) compared to ADMA (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUTU dropped -87.23% vs ADMA's -91.28%.

FUTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUTU and ADMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer