FUTG vs. SPUU
FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FUTG is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
FUTG vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FUTG achieves a -75.13% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 15.56% return.
FUTG
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -61.72%
- YTD
- -75.13%
- 6M
- -77.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 47.93%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 24.69%
FUTG vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | -75.13% | -0.20% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 15.56% | 4.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FUTG and SPUU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FUTG vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
FUTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPUU
FUTG vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FUTG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.61 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FUTG vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FUTG drawdown since its inception was -86.19%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUTG and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FUTG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.19% | -59.35% | -26.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.04% | -4.78% | -79.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.98% | -9.49% | -32.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.23% | — |
Volatility
FUTG vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FUTG | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.43% | 24.81% | +108.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 133.43% | 33.59% | +99.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 133.43% | 35.83% | +97.60% |
FUTG vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FUTG vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
FUTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.39% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FUTG and SPUU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for FUTG.
SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.00% for FUTG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FUTG and 0.60% for SPUU.
Find the right allocation for FUTG and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer