FUTG vs. CELT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF) and CELT (Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FUTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for CELT.

Performance

FUTG vs. CELT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FUTG

• 1D: 3.79%
• 1M: -61.72%
• YTD: -75.13%
• 6M: -77.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CELT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUTG vs. CELT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF	-75.13%	-0.20%
CELT Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF	-19.49%	-53.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FUTG and CELT is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

FUTG vs. CELT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long FUTU Daily ETF (FUTG) and Tradr 2X Long CELH Daily ETF (CELT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FUTG	CELT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.04%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.98%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FUTG	CELT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	133.43%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	133.43%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	133.43%	—	—

FUTG vs. CELT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CELT's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

FUTG vs. CELT - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUTG nor CELT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUTG and CELT in my portfolio?

FUTG and CELT have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FUTG or CELT?

On fees, FUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FUTG or CELT?

FUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CELT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FUTG or CELT?

FUTG and CELT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FUTG and CELT?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr ETFs. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FUTG and 1.30% for CELT.