FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FUSA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) and FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FUSA.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while FUQA.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Fidelity US Quality Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUSA.L returned 11.76%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for FUQA.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FUSA.L is traded in USD, while FUQA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FUQA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.L achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than FUQA.L's 8.61% return.

FUSA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.55%
• YTD: 8.02%
• 6M: 8.85%
• 1Y: 23.71%
• 3Y*: 17.99%
• 5Y*: 11.76%
• 10Y*: —

FUQA.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 9.11%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 11.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FUSA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	8.02%	16.31%	17.98%	18.04%	-10.51%	26.22%	12.02%	33.15%	-7.83%
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	8.61%	16.04%	17.51%	17.75%	-10.69%	26.66%	11.54%	32.33%	-4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.L and FUQA.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2018	0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between FUSA.L and FUQA.L has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FUSA.L	FUQA.L
Technology	35.0%	36.9%
Financial Services	12.6%	12.1%
Communication Services	10.6%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	9.1%
Healthcare	9.1%	9.0%
Industrials	8.8%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	4.4%
Energy	3.5%	3.3%
Utilities	2.3%	2.1%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.1%

Return for Risk

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.L

FUSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
FUSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FUSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FUSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
FUSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

FUQA.L

FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) and Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUSA.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.09	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.95	+0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.38	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	2.74	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.66	12.87	-0.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.L and FUQA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUSA.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	2.09	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	0.80	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.93	-0.09

Drawdowns

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, roughly equal to the maximum FUQA.L drawdown of -35.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.L and FUQA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUSA.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.84%	-35.38%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.10%	-8.62%	+0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.91%	-17.72%	-0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.37%	-20.19%	+0.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	-0.16%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-4.03%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	1.84%	+0.03%

Volatility

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUSA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) at 2.72%. This indicates that FUSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUQA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUSA.L	FUQA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	2.72%	+0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	8.82%	-1.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.55%	11.28%	-0.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.77%	14.69%	+0.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.29%	17.30%	-0.01%

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FUSA.L and FUQA.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FUSA.L vs. FUQA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUSA.L nor FUQA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUSA.L and FUQA.L in my portfolio?

FUSA.L and FUQA.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FUSA.L or FUQA.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FUSA.L or FUQA.L?

FUSA.L and FUQA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

What is the main difference between FUSA.L and FUQA.L?

FUSA.L is categorized as Dividend, while FUQA.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. Both ETFs track Fidelity US Quality Income Index.