PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUSA.DE vs. IUSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUSA.DE is traded in EUR, while IUSG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IUSG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUSA.DE achieves a 9.43% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 12.79% return.


FUSA.DE

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.72%
YTD
9.43%
6M
9.69%
1Y
22.62%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
12.41%
10Y*

IUSG

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
12.79%
6M
11.48%
1Y
27.96%
3Y*
23.59%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
17.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUSA.DE
Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc
9.43%3.92%24.24%14.25%-5.68%37.59%1.53%35.33%0.00%-3.08%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
12.79%6.85%43.59%25.40%-24.40%41.08%21.71%33.57%3.86%6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FUSA.DE and IUSG is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.51

The correlation between FUSA.DE and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUSA.DE
FUSA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUSA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUSA.DEIUSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

2.34

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.80

8.16

+8.64

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUSA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the IUSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUSA.DE and IUSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUSA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, smaller than the maximum IUSG drawdown of -45.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUSA.DE and IUSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUSA.DEIUSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-45.82%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-12.02%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.87%

-27.11%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.87%

-27.11%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-3.04%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-7.91%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.34%

3.43%

-2.09%

Volatility

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc (FUSA.DE) is 2.78%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a volatility of 6.25%. This indicates that FUSA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUSA.DEIUSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

6.25%

-3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

12.53%

-5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.38%

16.67%

-6.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.95%

20.73%

-6.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

20.83%

-3.65%

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUSA.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUSA.DE vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison

FUSA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUSA.DE
Fidelity US Quality Income UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.50%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUSA.DE and IUSG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for FUSA.DE.

FUSA.DE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IUSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. FUSA.DE tracks Fidelity US Quality Income NR USD, while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FUSA.DE and 0.04% for IUSG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUSA.DE and IUSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer