PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FUQA.L is traded in GBp, while FLXU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FLXU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUQA.L achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than FLXU.L's 12.62% return.


FUQA.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.46%
YTD
8.20%
6M
8.59%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*

FLXU.L

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.02%
YTD
12.62%
6M
12.44%
1Y
29.08%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
12.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FUQA.L
Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc
8.20%8.56%19.50%11.85%-0.00%27.82%8.23%27.23%1.10%7.65%
FLXU.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
12.62%13.11%12.50%8.51%2.19%28.57%5.69%24.32%1.87%8.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FUQA.L and FLXU.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017

0.90

The correlation between FUQA.L and FLXU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUQA.L
FLXU.L

Technology

37.1%
37.1%

Financial Services

12.4%
10.1%

Communication Services

9.8%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
11.0%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.0%

Industrials

8.7%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.1%

Energy

3.1%
0.9%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.6%

Utilities

2.0%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.7%

Technology

FUQA.L
37.1%
FLXU.L
37.1%

Financial Services

FUQA.L
12.4%
FLXU.L
10.1%

Communication Services

FUQA.L
9.8%
FLXU.L
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FUQA.L
9.3%
FLXU.L
11.0%

Healthcare

FUQA.L
9.0%
FLXU.L
10.0%

Industrials

FUQA.L
8.7%
FLXU.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

FUQA.L
4.5%
FLXU.L
4.1%

Energy

FUQA.L
3.1%
FLXU.L
0.9%

Basic Materials

FUQA.L
2.2%
FLXU.L
1.6%

Utilities

FUQA.L
2.0%
FLXU.L
1.4%

Real Estate

FUQA.L
2.0%
FLXU.L
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUQA.L
FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXU.L
FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FUQA.LFLXU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.45

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

4.91

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.98

17.58

-1.61

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUQA.L and FLXU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, which is greater than FLXU.L's maximum drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUQA.L and FLXU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUQA.LFLXU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.34%

-24.72%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.01%

-5.90%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.49%

-20.13%

-0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.49%

-20.13%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.07%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-2.80%

-4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.65%

-0.15%

Volatility

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) is 2.87%, while Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that FUQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUQA.LFLXU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

3.84%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

8.69%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.58%

11.66%

-2.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

13.13%

+5.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

14.88%

+7.53%

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FUQA.L and FLXU.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FUQA.L vs. FLXU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUQA.L nor FLXU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FUQA.L and FLXU.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FUQA.L and FLXU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while FLXU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Franklin Templeton.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUQA.L and FLXU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer