PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLXU.L vs. METU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLXU.L vs. METU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLXU.L vs. METU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FLXU.L
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF
-0.65%13.10%12.49%8.52%-2.89%
METU.L
Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc
-13.84%10.47%21.99%66.81%-24.07%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLXU.L achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly higher than METU.L's -13.84% return.


FLXU.L

1D
2.09%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
-0.65%
6M
1.98%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*

METU.L

1D
3.66%
1M
-6.02%
YTD
-13.84%
6M
-19.03%
1Y
14.63%
3Y*
16.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLXU.L vs. METU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLXU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than METU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FLXU.L vs. METU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLXU.L
FLXU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

METU.L
METU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
METU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
METU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
METU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
METU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLXU.L vs. METU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) and Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLXU.LMETU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

0.55

+0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

0.91

+0.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.12

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

0.45

+2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.21

1.16

+9.05

FLXU.L vs. METU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLXU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the METU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLXU.L and METU.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLXU.LMETU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.55

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.42

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between FLXU.L and METU.L is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FLXU.L vs. METU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FLXU.L nor METU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FLXU.L vs. METU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLXU.L drawdown since its inception was -24.72%, smaller than the maximum METU.L drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLXU.L and METU.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLXU.LMETU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.72%

-32.01%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-29.65%

+19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.21%

-26.52%

+23.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-9.46%

+6.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

11.60%

-9.81%

Volatility

FLXU.L vs. METU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity UCITS ETF (FLXU.L) is 4.43%, while Franklin AI, Metaverse and Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Acc (METU.L) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that FLXU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLXU.LMETU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

6.89%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.93%

18.61%

-9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.52%

26.52%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.04%

27.04%

-14.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

27.04%

-12.05%