FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FUQA.L (Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc) and BBSU.L (JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FUQA.L tracks the Fidelity US Quality Income Index while BBSU.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FUQA.L returned 12.92%/yr vs 14.50%/yr for BBSU.L. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FUQA.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BBSU.L.

Performance

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUQA.L achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than BBSU.L's 10.31% return.

FUQA.L

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 4.29%
• YTD: 8.88%
• 6M: 8.31%
• 1Y: 24.89%
• 3Y*: 14.90%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: —

BBSU.L

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 5.58%
• YTD: 10.31%
• 6M: 10.11%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 14.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FUQA.L Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc	8.88%	7.90%	19.50%	11.85%	-0.00%	27.82%	8.23%	13.10%
BBSU.L JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc)	10.31%	9.39%	27.19%	20.71%	-10.46%	29.25%	16.07%	11.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FUQA.L and BBSU.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019	0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between FUQA.L and BBSU.L has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FUQA.L	BBSU.L
Technology	36.9%	35.4%
Financial Services	12.1%	11.8%
Communication Services	10.3%	11.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	10.1%
Healthcare	9.0%	8.6%
Industrials	8.6%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	4.8%
Energy	3.3%	3.6%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.7%
Utilities	2.1%	2.3%
Real Estate	2.1%	1.8%

Return for Risk

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUQA.L

FUQA.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FUQA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FUQA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FUQA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FUQA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

BBSU.L

BBSU.L Risk / Return Rank: 79
BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
BBSU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BBSU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
BBSU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BBSU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FUQA.L	BBSU.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.70	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	3.60	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.50	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	3.65	-0.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.10	12.74	+3.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUQA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the BBSU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUQA.L and BBSU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FUQA.L	BBSU.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.70	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	1.00	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	0.96	-0.03

Drawdowns

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUQA.L drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, which is greater than BBSU.L's maximum drawdown of -25.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUQA.L and BBSU.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FUQA.L	BBSU.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.34%	-25.80%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-7.80%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.99%	-21.42%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.99%	-21.42%	+2.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.17%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.19%	-3.72%	+0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.54%	2.24%	-0.70%

Volatility

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity US Quality Income ETF Acc (FUQA.L) is 2.27%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Equity UCITS ETF (Acc) (BBSU.L) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that FUQA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FUQA.L	BBSU.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.27%	2.64%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.26%	7.21%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.20%	10.54%	-0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.30%	14.45%	-1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.29%	16.10%	+0.19%

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUQA.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BBSU.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FUQA.L vs. BBSU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither FUQA.L nor BBSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FUQA.L and BBSU.L in my portfolio?

FUQA.L and BBSU.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FUQA.L or BBSU.L?

On fees, BBSU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FUQA.L or BBSU.L?

BBSU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FUQA.L.

What is the main difference between FUQA.L and BBSU.L?

FUQA.L tracks Fidelity US Quality Income Index, while BBSU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FUQA.L and 0.05% for BBSU.L.