PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUNL vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FUNL vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNL achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 49.00% return.


FUNL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.66%
6M
7.22%
1Y
18.97%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

VLUE

1D
-0.42%
1M
20.77%
YTD
49.00%
6M
51.40%
1Y
91.45%
3Y*
34.26%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
15.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FUNL vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
5.66%14.62%15.55%14.33%-5.76%25.93%14.92%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
49.00%32.67%7.25%14.26%-14.17%28.93%17.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FUNL and VLUE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2020

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between FUNL and VLUE has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FUNL vs. VLUE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FUNL
VLUE

Financial Services

19.3%
10.4%

Healthcare

15.3%
8.5%

Technology

14.6%
44.5%

Industrials

11.5%
7.4%

Energy

7.6%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
8.3%

Communication Services

5.8%
8.3%

Utilities

5.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

4.5%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.6%

Financial Services

FUNL
19.3%
VLUE
10.4%

Healthcare

FUNL
15.3%
VLUE
8.5%

Technology

FUNL
14.6%
VLUE
44.5%

Industrials

FUNL
11.5%
VLUE
7.4%

Energy

FUNL
7.6%
VLUE
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

FUNL
7.0%
VLUE
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FUNL
6.5%
VLUE
8.3%

Communication Services

FUNL
5.8%
VLUE
8.3%

Utilities

FUNL
5.0%
VLUE
2.0%

Real Estate

FUNL
4.5%
VLUE
1.8%

Basic Materials

FUNL
2.2%
VLUE
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FUNL vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNL
FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUNL vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUNLVLUEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

5.32

-3.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

6.86

-3.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.91

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

10.17

-5.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.31

45.62

-22.31

FUNL vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUNL Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 5.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUNL and VLUE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUNLVLUEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

5.32

-3.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.92

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.76

+0.19

Drawdowns

FUNL vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNL drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, smaller than the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNL and VLUE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNLVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-39.47%

+20.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

-9.04%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.37%

-17.89%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

-27.12%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.42%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-6.01%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

2.01%

-1.19%

Volatility

FUNL vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) is 0.00%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that FUNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FUNLVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

8.03%

-8.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

13.96%

-8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.82%

17.30%

-8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.16%

17.78%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.29%

19.82%

-4.53%

FUNL vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUNL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

FUNL vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than VLUE's 1.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
2.25%2.10%1.78%1.69%1.84%1.55%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
1.40%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


FUNL and VLUE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VLUE has higher volatility (8.03%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FUNL dropped -19.35% vs VLUE's -39.47%.

On 5-year performance, VLUE leads with 16.36% vs 9.42% for FUNL. On fees, VLUE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VLUE has performed better with a 16.36% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VLUE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FUNL.

FUNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.25%, compared with 1.40% for VLUE.

They also come from different issuers: CornerCap and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FUNL and 0.15% for VLUE.

VLUE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.32 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FUNL and VLUE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer