PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FUNL vs. SEIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FUNL vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FUNL vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
5.66%14.62%15.55%14.33%2.06%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
0.66%27.43%19.73%21.90%-3.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FUNL achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly higher than SEIV's 0.66% return.


FUNL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.66%
6M
9.20%
1Y
21.44%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*

SEIV

1D
0.52%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
0.66%
6M
7.86%
1Y
30.43%
3Y*
22.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FUNL vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FUNL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FUNL vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FUNL
FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIV
SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FUNL vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FUNLSEIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.68

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

2.34

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

2.41

-0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.41

11.96

-3.55

FUNL vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FUNL Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FUNL and SEIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FUNLSEIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.68

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.98

-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between FUNL and SEIV is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FUNL vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

FUNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than SEIV's 1.50% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FUNL
CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL
2.25%2.10%1.78%1.69%1.84%1.55%0.45%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
1.50%1.51%1.66%2.08%1.63%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FUNL vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FUNL drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than SEIV's maximum drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FUNL and SEIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FUNLSEIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-18.18%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.76%

-12.82%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-4.19%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-3.60%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

2.58%

-0.21%

Volatility

FUNL vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) is 0.12%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that FUNL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FUNLSEIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

4.40%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.10%

9.50%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12%

18.25%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

16.81%

-1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.53%

16.81%

-1.28%