FTXO vs. IAK
FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) and IAK (iShares U.S. Insurance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - FTXO tracks the NASDAQ US Banks Index while IAK tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXO returned 5.35%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for IAK. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IAK.
Performance
FTXO vs. IAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXO achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly higher than IAK's -4.56% return.
FTXO
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 24.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- —
IAK
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 6M
- -1.81%
- 1Y
- -4.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
FTXO vs. IAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 0.81% | 21.32% | 29.05% | 0.05% | -17.93% | 40.53% | -12.53% | 30.11% | -21.79% | 14.25% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | -4.56% | 9.50% | 28.25% | 11.28% | 11.33% | 26.84% | -2.86% | 25.94% | -11.48% | 14.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXO and IAK is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2016 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTXO and IAK has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FTXO vs. IAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXO
IAK
Financial Services
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FTXO
IAK
Technology
FTXO
IAK
-
Basic Materials
FTXO
-
IAK
-
Communication Services
FTXO
-
IAK
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXO
-
IAK
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXO
-
IAK
-
Energy
FTXO
-
IAK
-
Healthcare
FTXO
-
IAK
Industrials
FTXO
-
IAK
-
Real Estate
FTXO
-
IAK
-
Utilities
FTXO
-
IAK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXO vs. IAK — Risk / Return Rank
FTXO
IAK
FTXO vs. IAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.97 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | -0.55 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | -1.14 | +5.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | -0.28 | +1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.64 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.26 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
FTXO vs. IAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXO drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, smaller than the maximum IAK drawdown of -77.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXO and IAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.26% | -77.38% | +22.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.69% | -7.62% | -9.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.84% | -11.58% | -14.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.55% | -14.76% | -31.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -5.82% | -2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.88% | -16.13% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 3.96% | +2.05% |
Volatility
FTXO vs. IAK - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) at 3.82%. This indicates that FTXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXO | IAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 3.82% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | 9.98% | +5.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.80% | 14.77% | +6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.01% | 18.07% | +8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.98% | 20.89% | +9.09% |
FTXO vs. IAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IAK's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXO vs. IAK - Dividend Comparison
FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than IAK's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF | 1.78% | 1.92% | 2.18% | 3.20% | 2.94% | 1.64% | 2.74% | 2.53% | 3.51% | 1.09% | 0.16% | 0.00% |
IAK iShares U.S. Insurance ETF | 2.76% | 1.69% | 1.49% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 2.26% | 2.07% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 1.62% | 1.68% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXO and IAK have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXO has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to IAK (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXO dropped -55.26% vs IAK's -77.38%.
On 5-year performance, IAK leads with 11.50% vs 5.35% for FTXO. On fees, IAK is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, IAK has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IAK has performed better with a 11.50% return vs 5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAK is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXO.
IAK has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 1.78% for FTXO.
FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index, while IAK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Insurance Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXO and 0.43% for IAK.
FTXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXO and IAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer