PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTXO vs. FDIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTXO vs. FDIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXO achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly higher than FDIQ's 4.98% return.


FTXO

1D
0.29%
1M
8.86%
YTD
10.30%
6M
7.40%
1Y
30.62%
3Y*
29.39%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*

FDIQ

1D
-0.59%
1M
-8.29%
YTD
4.98%
6M
2.01%
1Y
15.43%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
7.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXO vs. FDIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTXO
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
10.30%21.32%29.05%0.05%-17.93%40.53%-12.53%30.11%-21.79%14.25%
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
4.98%6.32%12.76%-0.84%-7.23%36.05%-8.95%23.57%-18.31%1.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXO and FDIQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2016

0.90

Over the past year, the correlation between FTXO and FDIQ has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTXO vs. FDIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXO
FTXO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FTXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIQ
FDIQ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FDIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXO vs. FDIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTXOFDIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.15

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

1.24

+0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.09

3.19

+1.90

FTXO vs. FDIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTXO Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the FDIQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTXO and FDIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTXO vs. FDIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXO drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FDIQ drawdown of -52.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXO and FDIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTXOFDIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.26%

-52.86%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.69%

-12.47%

-4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.84%

-28.09%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.55%

-42.99%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.47%

+12.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.79%

-11.54%

-4.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

4.86%

+1.17%

Volatility

FTXO vs. FDIQ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF (FDIQ) at 5.47%. This indicates that FTXO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTXOFDIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

5.47%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.76%

14.13%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.80%

22.04%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.90%

28.53%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.93%

31.04%

-1.11%

FTXO vs. FDIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTXO vs. FDIQ - Dividend Comparison

FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than FDIQ's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIQ
Invesco Bloomberg Financial Data Providers ETF
2.38%2.66%2.69%2.89%2.51%2.04%2.92%2.44%2.45%1.59%1.50%1.92%
FTXO
First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF
1.63%1.92%2.18%3.20%2.94%1.64%2.74%2.53%3.51%1.09%0.16%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTXO and FDIQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXO has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to FDIQ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXO dropped -55.26% vs FDIQ's -52.86%.

On 5-year performance, FTXO leads with 8.30% vs 3.53% for FDIQ. On fees, FDIQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FDIQ has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXO has performed better with a 8.30% return vs 3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXO.

FDIQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.63% for FTXO.

FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index, while FDIQ tracks Bloomberg Financial Data Providers Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXO and 0.35% for FDIQ.

FTXO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTXO and FDIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer