FTXO vs. BCFN

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FTXO (First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF) and BCFN (Baron Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - FTXO tracks the NASDAQ US Banks Index while BCFN tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BCFN.

Performance

FTXO vs. BCFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and Baron Financials ETF (BCFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTXO achieves a 10.30% return, which is significantly higher than BCFN's -14.97% return.

FTXO

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 10.30%
• 6M: 7.40%
• 1Y: 30.62%
• 3Y*: 29.39%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: —

BCFN

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: -14.97%
• 6M: -16.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTXO vs. BCFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF	10.30%	-0.28%
BCFN Baron Financials ETF	-14.97%	-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FTXO and BCFN is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

FTXO vs. BCFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTXO

FTXO Risk / Return Rank: 43
FTXO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
FTXO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
FTXO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FTXO Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FTXO Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BCFN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTXO vs. BCFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF (FTXO) and Baron Financials ETF (BCFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTXO	BCFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.09	—	—

Drawdowns

FTXO vs. BCFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTXO drawdown since its inception was -55.26%, which is greater than BCFN's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXO and BCFN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTXO	BCFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.26%	-20.95%	-34.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.69%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-17.09%	+17.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.79%	-12.63%	-3.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.03%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FTXO	BCFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.88%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.76%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.80%	18.90%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.90%	18.90%	+8.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.93%	18.90%	+11.03%

FTXO vs. BCFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTXO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFN's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTXO vs. BCFN - Dividend Comparison

FTXO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while BCFN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BCFN Baron Financials ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FTXO First Trust Nasdaq Bank ETF	1.63%	1.92%	2.18%	3.20%	2.94%	1.64%	2.74%	2.53%	3.51%	1.09%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTXO and BCFN in my portfolio?

FTXO and BCFN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FTXO or BCFN?

On fees, FTXO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTXO or BCFN?

FTXO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCFN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTXO or BCFN?

FTXO has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.00% for BCFN.

What is the main difference between FTXO and BCFN?

FTXO tracks NASDAQ US Banks Index, while BCFN tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Baron Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXO and 0.80% for BCFN.