FTXL vs. DRAM
FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. FTXL is passively managed, while DRAM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FTXL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.
Performance
FTXL vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FTXL
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -9.62%
- 6M
- 57.32%
- YTD
- 78.28%
- 1Y
- 140.44%
- 3Y*
- 48.06%
- 5Y*
- 27.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 28.78%
DRAM
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -17.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.16B | $4.38B | $3.61B | |
| $138.68M | $95.49M | $85.62M |
FTXL vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 51.71% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 99.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXL and DRAM is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.84 |
FTXL vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXL
DRAM
Technology
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
FTXL
DRAM
Industrials
FTXL
DRAM
-
Basic Materials
FTXL
-
DRAM
-
Communication Services
FTXL
-
DRAM
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXL
-
DRAM
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXL
-
DRAM
-
Energy
FTXL
-
DRAM
-
Financial Services
FTXL
-
DRAM
Healthcare
FTXL
-
DRAM
-
Real Estate
FTXL
-
DRAM
-
Utilities
FTXL
-
DRAM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXL vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank
FTXL
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTXL vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXL | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.79 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXL vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXL drawdown since its inception was -43.87%, roughly equal to the maximum DRAM drawdown of -44.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXL and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXL | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.87% | -44.44% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.26% | -33.42% | +11.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -11.32% | +0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | — | — |
Volatility
FTXL vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXL | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.69% | 99.91% | -53.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.39% | 99.91% | -61.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.35% | 99.91% | -64.56% |
FTXL vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXL vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
FTXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.11% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXL and DRAM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.
FTXL has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
FTXL is categorized as Semiconductors, while DRAM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXL and 0.65% for DRAM.
Find the right allocation for FTXL and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer