FTWO vs. NVIR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTWO (Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF) and NVIR (Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. FTWO is passively managed, while NVIR is actively managed. Over the past year, FTWO returned 30.91% vs 34.67% for NVIR. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NVIR.

Performance

FTWO vs. NVIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTWO achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than NVIR's 22.17% return.

FTWO

• 1D: -0.94%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: 10.90%
• 6M: 13.58%
• 1Y: 30.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVIR

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 22.17%
• 6M: 19.29%
• 1Y: 34.67%
• 3Y*: 19.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTWO vs. NVIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	10.90%	43.06%	14.97%	1.46%
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	22.17%	9.84%	17.53%	-4.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FTWO and NVIR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023	0.62

The correlation between FTWO and NVIR shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTWO vs. NVIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTWO	NVIR
Industrials	32.2%	11.1%
Energy	29.1%	78.9%
Basic Materials	25.9%	1.6%
Utilities	11.7%	3.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	1.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	2.6%

Return for Risk

FTWO vs. NVIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTWO

FTWO Risk / Return Rank: 49
FTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 44

NVIR

NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 70
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTWO vs. NVIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTWO	NVIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.18	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	2.88	-0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.37	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	4.95	-2.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.23	14.32	-7.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTWO vs. NVIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTWO Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the NVIR Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTWO and NVIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTWO	NVIR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	2.18	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.31	0.90	+0.41

Drawdowns

FTWO vs. NVIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTWO drawdown since its inception was -18.17%, smaller than the maximum NVIR drawdown of -22.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTWO and NVIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTWO	NVIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-22.47%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.54%	-7.04%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-22.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.19%	-3.08%	-6.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.43%	-4.58%	+1.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.29%	2.43%	+1.86%

Volatility

FTWO vs. NVIR - Volatility Comparison

Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF (FTWO) and Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) have volatilities of 5.79% and 5.78%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTWO	NVIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.79%	5.78%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.59%	12.26%	+2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.09%	16.05%	+2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.23%	19.24%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.23%	19.24%	-0.01%

FTWO vs. NVIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NVIR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTWO vs. NVIR - Dividend Comparison

FTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than NVIR's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FTWO Strive Natural Resources and Security ETF	1.01%	1.02%	1.23%	0.59%
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	0.75%	0.92%	1.50%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTWO and NVIR in my portfolio?

FTWO and NVIR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTWO or NVIR?

FTWO has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to NVIR (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTWO dropped -18.17% vs NVIR's -22.47%.

Which ETF is better, FTWO or NVIR?

On 1-year performance, NVIR leads with 34.67% vs 30.91% for FTWO. On fees, FTWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTWO or NVIR?

Over the 1-year period, NVIR has performed better with a 34.67% return vs 30.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTWO or NVIR?

FTWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NVIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTWO or NVIR?

FTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.75% for NVIR.

What is the main difference between FTWO and NVIR?

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FTWO and 0.85% for NVIR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVIR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.