FTT.TO vs. POU.TO
FTT.TO (Finning International Inc.) and POU.TO (Paramount Resources Ltd.) are both stocks. FTT.TO operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while POU.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, FTT.TO returned 19.54%/yr vs 17.14%/yr for POU.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTT.TO achieves a 30.45% return, which is significantly higher than POU.TO's 23.00% return. Over the past 10 years, FTT.TO has outperformed POU.TO with an annualized return of 19.54%, while POU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 17.14% annualized return.
FTT.TO
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -5.42%
- YTD
- 30.45%
- 6M
- 29.08%
- 1Y
- 78.99%
- 3Y*
- 38.08%
- 5Y*
- 27.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.54%
POU.TO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- YTD
- 23.00%
- 6M
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 37.47%
- 3Y*
- 4.30%
- 5Y*
- 21.00%
- 10Y*
- 17.14%
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTT.TO Finning International Inc. | 30.45% | 99.50% | 2.20% | 16.93% | 8.70% | 21.09% | 11.28% | 10.09% | -22.99% | 24.04% |
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd. | 23.00% | -21.48% | 30.17% | -4.83% | 21.05% | 396.81% | -33.69% | 5.01% | -63.03% | 22.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTT.TO and POU.TO is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTT.TO and POU.TO has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FTT.TO:
CA$12.64B
POU.TO:
CA$4.35B
FTT.TO:
CA$5.11
POU.TO:
CA$0.37
FTT.TO:
18.86
POU.TO:
80.47
FTT.TO:
1.26
POU.TO:
0.80
FTT.TO:
1.20
POU.TO:
4.74
FTT.TO:
4.39
POU.TO:
1.58
FTT.TO:
CA$10.64B
POU.TO:
CA$902.30M
FTT.TO:
CA$2.44B
POU.TO:
CA$181.10M
FTT.TO:
CA$1.21B
POU.TO:
CA$329.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FTT.TO
POU.TO
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) and Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTT.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.25 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 2.27 | +2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.26 | 5.78 | +9.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTT.TO drawdown since its inception was -68.67%, smaller than the maximum POU.TO drawdown of -98.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTT.TO and POU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTT.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.67% | -98.31% | +29.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.67% | -18.11% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.50% | -53.34% | +28.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.10% | -56.46% | +17.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.63% | -96.12% | +30.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.81% | -37.16% | +26.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.55% | -54.12% | +34.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 7.11% | -1.91% |
Volatility
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Finning International Inc. (FTT.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.80% compared to Paramount Resources Ltd. (POU.TO) at 10.34%. This indicates that FTT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTT.TO | POU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.80% | 10.34% | +3.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.31% | 24.14% | +4.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.48% | 30.56% | +4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 45.18% | -12.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.83% | 57.44% | -25.61% |
Dividends
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than POU.TO's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTT.TO Finning International Inc. | 1.28% | 1.59% | 2.82% | 2.57% | 2.77% | 2.70% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 3.32% | 2.35% | 2.78% | 3.88% |
POU.TO Paramount Resources Ltd. | 2.04% | 2.89% | 5.34% | 5.78% | 3.95% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finning International Inc. and Paramount Resources Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTT.TO vs. POU.TO - Profitability Comparison
FTT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported a gross profit of 586.00M and revenue of 2.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
POU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a gross profit of 60.10M and revenue of 280.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
FTT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported an operating income of 187.00M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.
POU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported an operating income of 40.10M and revenue of 280.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.
FTT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Finning International Inc. reported a net income of 121.00M and revenue of 2.50B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.
POU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Paramount Resources Ltd. reported a net income of 53.20M and revenue of 280.40M, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTT.TO and POU.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTT.TO and POU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer