FTSIX vs. LLSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX).
FTSIX is managed by Fuller & Thaler Asset Mgmt. It was launched on Dec 26, 2018. LLSCX is managed by Longleaf Partners. It was launched on Feb 21, 1989.
Performance
FTSIX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTSIX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSIX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund | 3.61% | 6.04% | 11.86% | 18.52% | -17.63% | 25.29% | 19.19% | 26.72% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -3.68% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTSIX achieves a 3.61% return, which is significantly higher than LLSCX's -3.68% return.
FTSIX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -6.26%
- YTD
- 3.61%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- —
LLSCX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTSIX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTSIX has a 2.69% expense ratio, which is higher than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTSIX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank
FTSIX
LLSCX
FTSIX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTSIX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.15 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 0.32 | +0.95 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.10 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.30 | 0.30 | +4.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTSIX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.15 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.11 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTSIX and LLSCX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTSIX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison
FTSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than LLSCX's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTSIX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.95% | 5.50% | 0.35% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.22% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
Drawdowns
FTSIX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTSIX drawdown since its inception was -42.12%, smaller than the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSIX and LLSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTSIX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.12% | -63.97% | +21.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -10.47% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | -28.37% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -7.92% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -8.90% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 3.68% | -0.41% |
Volatility
FTSIX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) at 3.90%. This indicates that FTSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTSIX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 3.90% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.04% | 9.23% | +1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.05% | 15.42% | +4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 17.00% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.47% | 24.58% | -1.11% |