PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTSIX vs. FMDCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTSIX vs. FMDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) and Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTSIX achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly higher than FMDCX's 15.81% return.


FTSIX

1D
0.06%
1M
3.67%
YTD
16.70%
6M
14.75%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*

FMDCX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.75%
YTD
15.81%
6M
13.76%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
8.62%
10Y*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTSIX vs. FMDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
16.70%6.04%11.86%18.52%-17.63%25.29%19.19%26.72%0.00%
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
15.81%6.95%13.34%16.38%-13.88%25.28%13.37%25.36%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FTSIX and FMDCX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between FTSIX and FMDCX has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTSIX vs. FMDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTSIX
FTSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FTSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FMDCX
FMDCX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTSIX vs. FMDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) and Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTSIXFMDCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

3.84

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.38

14.22

-0.84

FTSIX vs. FMDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTSIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the FMDCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTSIX and FMDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTSIX vs. FMDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTSIX drawdown since its inception was -42.12%, smaller than the maximum FMDCX drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTSIX and FMDCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSIXFMDCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.12%

-55.36%

+13.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-8.75%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.30%

-24.16%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.57%

-24.16%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

0.00%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.60%

-6.79%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.32%

+0.01%

Volatility

FTSIX vs. FMDCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund (FTSIX) is 4.15%, while Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund (FMDCX) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that FTSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSIXFMDCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

4.58%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

12.52%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.91%

16.48%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

20.37%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.29%

21.41%

+1.88%

FTSIX vs. FMDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTSIX has a 2.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDCX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTSIX vs. FMDCX - Dividend Comparison

FTSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FMDCX's 9.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMDCX
Federated Hermes Mid Cap Index Fund
9.19%10.67%15.63%11.46%12.33%22.20%15.60%10.60%26.14%17.30%11.41%14.68%
FTSIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Mid Core Equity Fund
0.55%0.64%0.84%0.85%0.95%5.50%0.35%2.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTSIX and FMDCX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMDCX has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to FTSIX (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTSIX dropped -42.12% vs FMDCX's -55.36%.

FMDCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTSIX and FMDCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer