PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTS vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTS vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortis Inc (FTS) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTS achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 2.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FTS having a 10.07% annualized return and USMV not far behind at 9.90%.


FTS

1D
0.87%
1M
2.11%
YTD
11.40%
6M
13.52%
1Y
22.71%
3Y*
14.70%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
10.07%

USMV

1D
0.43%
1M
1.84%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.34%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTS vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTS
Fortis Inc
11.40%29.62%5.81%7.38%-13.69%22.73%1.91%29.00%-5.86%24.45%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
2.43%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FTS and USMV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between FTS and USMV has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTS vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTS
FTS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTS vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc (FTS) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTSUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.08

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

0.62

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

2.06

+6.99

FTS vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTS Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTS and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTS vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTS drawdown since its inception was -34.36%, roughly equal to the maximum USMV drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.36%

-33.10%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-6.46%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-9.36%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-17.93%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.36%

-33.10%

-1.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-1.40%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-2.87%

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

1.95%

+0.57%

Volatility

FTS vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

Fortis Inc (FTS) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.70%. This indicates that FTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

2.70%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

6.02%

+4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.48%

8.56%

+4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.31%

12.36%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

14.51%

+4.43%

Dividends

FTS vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

FTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than USMV's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTS
Fortis Inc
3.23%3.42%4.62%4.50%4.48%3.40%3.54%3.31%3.35%4.43%4.94%0.00%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.53%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTS and USMV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTS has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to USMV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTS dropped -34.36% vs USMV's -33.10%.

FTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTS and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer