FTS vs. TF.TO
FTS (Fortis Inc) and TF.TO (Timbercreek Financial Corp.) are both stocks. FTS operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while TF.TO operates in Mortgage Finance (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, FTS returned 8.43%/yr vs -1.21%/yr for TF.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTS vs. TF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTS is traded in USD, while TF.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the TF.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTS achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly higher than TF.TO's -1.57% return.
FTS
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 22.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
TF.TO
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- 0.28%
- 1Y
- -5.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.15%
- 5Y*
- -1.21%
- 10Y*
- —
FTS vs. TF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc | 11.40% | 29.62% | 5.81% | 7.38% | -13.69% | 22.73% | 1.91% | 29.00% | -5.86% | 24.45% |
TF.TO Timbercreek Financial Corp. | -1.57% | 11.68% | 7.02% | 5.71% | -24.41% | 19.65% | -3.15% | 27.25% | -9.56% | 27.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTS and TF.TO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2016 | 0.18 |
The correlation between FTS and TF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
FTS:
$28.94B
TF.TO:
CA$545.34M
FTS:
CA$3.40
TF.TO:
CA$0.36
FTS:
23.41
TF.TO:
18.15
FTS:
3.41
TF.TO:
0.84
FTS:
3.45
TF.TO:
3.74
FTS:
1.77
TF.TO:
0.83
FTS:
CA$12.22B
TF.TO:
CA$145.73M
FTS:
CA$7.44B
TF.TO:
CA$79.48M
FTS:
CA$5.80B
TF.TO:
CA$55.87M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTS vs. TF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FTS
TF.TO
FTS vs. TF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc (FTS) and Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTS | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.95 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | -0.30 | +3.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | -0.71 | +9.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTS vs. TF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTS drawdown since its inception was -34.36%, smaller than the maximum TF.TO drawdown of -45.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS and TF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTS | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.36% | -45.42% | +11.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -18.58% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -26.64% | +12.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.96% | -37.57% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -10.19% | +8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -9.16% | +2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 7.89% | -5.37% |
Volatility
FTS vs. TF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fortis Inc (FTS) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Timbercreek Financial Corp. (TF.TO) at 3.54%. This indicates that FTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTS | TF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 3.54% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 12.08% | -1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 16.24% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 19.52% | -3.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 20.42% | -1.48% |
Dividends
FTS vs. TF.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than TF.TO's 10.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.23% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 4.94% |
TF.TO Timbercreek Financial Corp. | 10.47% | 10.09% | 9.76% | 10.35% | 9.76% | 7.18% | 7.99% | 6.95% | 7.89% | 7.12% | 3.92% |
Financials
FTS vs. TF.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortis Inc and Timbercreek Financial Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTS vs. TF.TO - Profitability Comparison
FTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
TF.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a gross profit of 22.05M and revenue of 39.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.
FTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
TF.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported an operating income of 17.68M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.
FTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
TF.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Timbercreek Financial Corp. reported a net income of 10.37M and revenue of 39.10M, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTS and TF.TO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTS and TF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer