FTS vs. RSI.TO
FTS (Fortis Inc) and RSI.TO (Rogers Sugar Inc.) are both stocks. FTS operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities), while RSI.TO operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, FTS returned 10.07%/yr vs 7.41%/yr for RSI.TO. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTS vs. RSI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FTS is traded in USD, while RSI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the RSI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTS achieves a 11.40% return, which is significantly lower than RSI.TO's 15.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FTS has outperformed RSI.TO with an annualized return of 10.07%, while RSI.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.41% annualized return.
FTS
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 11.40%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 22.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
RSI.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.41%
FTS vs. RSI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc | 11.40% | 29.62% | 5.81% | 7.38% | -13.69% | 22.73% | 1.91% | 29.00% | -5.86% | 24.45% |
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 15.60% | 12.97% | 7.15% | 3.16% | -4.55% | 12.95% | 25.73% | 0.64% | -15.38% | 5.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTS and RSI.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
FTS:
$28.94B
RSI.TO:
CA$1.04B
FTS:
CA$3.40
RSI.TO:
CA$0.47
FTS:
23.41
RSI.TO:
14.64
FTS:
3.41
RSI.TO:
1.33
FTS:
3.45
RSI.TO:
0.82
FTS:
1.77
RSI.TO:
2.19
FTS:
CA$12.22B
RSI.TO:
CA$1.24B
FTS:
CA$7.44B
RSI.TO:
CA$199.73M
FTS:
CA$5.80B
RSI.TO:
CA$150.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTS vs. RSI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FTS
RSI.TO
FTS vs. RSI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc (FTS) and Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTS | RSI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.23 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.05 | 9.77 | -0.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTS vs. RSI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTS drawdown since its inception was -34.36%, smaller than the maximum RSI.TO drawdown of -56.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS and RSI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTS | RSI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.36% | -56.20% | +21.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -8.65% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.46% | -17.06% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.96% | -22.07% | -7.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.36% | -42.58% | +8.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | 0.00% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -12.73% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.85% | -0.33% |
Volatility
FTS vs. RSI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Fortis Inc (FTS) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO) at 3.10%. This indicates that FTS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTS | RSI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 3.10% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 9.76% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.48% | 15.05% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 17.36% | -1.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 20.03% | -1.09% |
Dividends
FTS vs. RSI.TO - Dividend Comparison
FTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than RSI.TO's 5.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTS Fortis Inc | 3.23% | 3.42% | 4.62% | 4.50% | 4.48% | 3.40% | 3.54% | 3.31% | 3.35% | 4.43% | 4.94% | 0.00% |
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 5.19% | 6.05% | 6.13% | 6.69% | 6.33% | 6.05% | 6.42% | 7.32% | 6.62% | 5.70% | 5.29% | 8.49% |
Financials
FTS vs. RSI.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortis Inc and Rogers Sugar Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FTS vs. RSI.TO - Profitability Comparison
FTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a gross profit of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
RSI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.72M and revenue of 280.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
FTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported an operating income of 935.41M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.6%.
RSI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported an operating income of 27.98M and revenue of 280.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
FTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortis Inc reported a net income of 524.35M and revenue of 3.39B, resulting in a net margin of 15.5%.
RSI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported a net income of 12.65M and revenue of 280.62M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FTS and RSI.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FTS and RSI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer