PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTS vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortis Inc (FTS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTS achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FTS has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.18%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.36% annualized return.


FTS

1D
1.07%
1M
2.00%
YTD
13.07%
6M
13.48%
1Y
28.26%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.18%

QQQ

1D
0.81%
1M
-1.80%
YTD
16.89%
6M
15.09%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
26.78%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
22.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTS vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTS
Fortis Inc
13.07%29.62%5.81%7.38%-13.69%22.73%1.91%29.00%-5.86%24.45%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.89%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FTS and QQQ is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.20

The correlation between FTS and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTS vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTS
FTS Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortis Inc (FTS) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTSQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.56

2.77

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

10.21

+1.12

FTS vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTS Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTS and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTS drawdown since its inception was -34.36%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTS and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTSQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.36%

-82.97%

+48.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.23%

-11.96%

+5.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.46%

-22.77%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.96%

-35.12%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.36%

-35.12%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-3.89%

+3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-32.72%

+25.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

3.24%

-0.74%

Volatility

FTS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortis Inc (FTS) is 4.74%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.02%. This indicates that FTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTSQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

9.02%

-4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

14.55%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

17.91%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.33%

22.69%

-6.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

22.41%

-3.46%

Dividends

FTS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

FTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than QQQ's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTS
Fortis Inc
3.18%3.42%4.62%4.50%4.48%3.40%3.54%3.31%3.35%4.43%4.94%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.42%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTS and QQQ have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.02%) compared to FTS (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTS dropped -34.36% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

FTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTS and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer