ETHY.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units (ETHY.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO).

ETHY.TO and CCCX-B.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETHY.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Dec 2, 2021. CCCX-B.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Aug 22, 2025.

Performance

ETHY.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units (ETHY.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETHY.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ETHY.TO Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units	-35.07%	-32.74%
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)	-26.11%	-27.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHY.TO achieves a -35.07% return, which is significantly lower than CCCX-B.TO's -26.11% return.

ETHY.TO

• 1D: 4.52%
• 1M: 11.25%
• YTD: -35.07%
• 6M: -52.44%
• 1Y: -1.23%
• 3Y*: -1.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCCX-B.TO

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: -26.11%
• 6M: -46.65%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHY.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CCCX-B.TO

CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)

Return for Risk

ETHY.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHY.TO

ETHY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 14
ETHY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
ETHY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
ETHY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 17
ETHY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
ETHY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHY.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units (ETHY.TO) and CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD) (CCCX-B.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ETHY.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.02	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.06	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.13	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETHY.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	-1.32	+0.99

Correlation

The correlation between ETHY.TO and CCCX-B.TO is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ETHY.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Dividend Comparison

ETHY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 33.33%, while CCCX-B.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ETHY.TO Purpose Ether Yield ETF - ETF Units	33.33%	19.33%	21.43%	10.44%	26.10%	2.40%
CCCX-B.TO CI Galaxy Core Multi-Crypto ETF (CAD)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ETHY.TO vs. CCCX-B.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHY.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.84%, which is greater than CCCX-B.TO's maximum drawdown of -54.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHY.TO and CCCX-B.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETHY.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.84%	-54.49%	-22.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.58%	-52.08%	-12.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.98%	-28.87%	-22.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETHY.TO	CCCX-B.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.15%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.80%	49.94%	+24.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.91%	49.94%	+15.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.91%	49.94%	+15.97%