PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRNX vs. ARKQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRNX vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRNX achieves a 14.86% return, which is significantly higher than ARKQ's 12.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRNX has underperformed ARKQ with an annualized return of 19.25%, while ARKQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.73% annualized return.


FTRNX

1D
3.65%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
14.86%
6M
15.64%
1Y
32.31%
3Y*
29.03%
5Y*
16.42%
10Y*
19.25%

ARKQ

1D
-0.64%
1M
-5.27%
YTD
12.86%
6M
13.25%
1Y
55.23%
3Y*
32.57%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
21.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTRNX vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
14.86%18.77%40.43%44.39%-33.66%22.86%47.01%36.12%-5.48%29.09%
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
12.86%48.81%33.88%40.70%-46.75%1.74%107.20%25.94%-7.89%52.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRNX and ARKQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2014

0.79

The correlation between FTRNX and ARKQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRNX vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRNX
FTRNX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
FTRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKQ
ARKQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ARKQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRNX vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTRNXARKQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.27

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.70

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.81

7.95

-0.14

FTRNX vs. ARKQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the ARKQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRNX and ARKQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTRNX vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRNX drawdown since its inception was -56.26%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -59.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRNX and ARKQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRNXARKQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.26%

-59.89%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.92%

-20.58%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.97%

-30.76%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.05%

-55.71%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.05%

-59.89%

+20.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.54%

-10.02%

+6.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.54%

-17.22%

+6.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

6.97%

-2.79%

Volatility

FTRNX vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Trend Fund (FTRNX) is 8.44%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 12.70%. This indicates that FTRNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRNXARKQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.44%

12.70%

-4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.94%

26.15%

-9.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.05%

33.54%

-12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.54%

32.50%

-5.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.11%

29.98%

-5.87%

FTRNX vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRNX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRNX vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison

FTRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than ARKQ's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKQ
ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
0.24%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.80%0.86%0.00%2.86%1.54%0.00%0.98%
FTRNX
Fidelity Trend Fund
5.59%8.23%15.26%4.69%5.34%7.80%4.44%9.65%8.30%8.62%5.25%6.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTRNX and ARKQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARKQ has higher volatility (12.70%) compared to FTRNX (8.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRNX dropped -56.26% vs ARKQ's -59.89%.

ARKQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRNX and ARKQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer