PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTRI vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTRI vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRI has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 10.05%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.


FTRI

1D
-0.97%
1M
2.46%
6M
-2.84%
YTD
6.71%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
11.41%

RDVY

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.71%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$358.94K$650.63K$673.37K
$77.65M$79.19M$83.63M

FTRI vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF
6.71%33.62%-3.93%1.53%7.49%25.29%-0.79%21.97%-8.34%11.77%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
17.25%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRI and RDVY is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2015

0.59

The correlation between FTRI and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTRI vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FTRI
RDVY

Basic Materials

44.5%

-

Utilities

27.7%
1.4%

Energy

16.8%
2.8%

Industrials

4.9%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
11.1%

Communication Services

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

38.9%

Healthcare

-

5.6%

Technology

-

19.4%

Basic Materials

FTRI
44.5%
RDVY

-

Utilities

FTRI
27.7%
RDVY
1.4%

Energy

FTRI
16.8%
RDVY
2.8%

Industrials

FTRI
4.9%
RDVY
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

FTRI
3.0%
RDVY
2.8%

Real Estate

FTRI
2.8%
RDVY

-

Consumer Cyclical

FTRI
0.2%
RDVY
11.1%

Communication Services

FTRI

-

RDVY
4.2%

Financial Services

FTRI

-

RDVY
38.9%

Healthcare

FTRI

-

RDVY
5.6%

Technology

FTRI

-

RDVY
19.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTRI vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTRI
FTRI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FTRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRI Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTRI vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FTRIRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

3.25

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.93

13.63

-10.70

FTRI vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRI and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FTRI vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTRIRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.82%

-40.60%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.04%

-9.04%

-8.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

-19.11%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-25.32%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.82%

-40.60%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.51%

0.00%

-12.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.54%

-4.95%

-3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.81%

2.15%

+4.66%

Volatility

FTRI vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FTRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTRIRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

3.53%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

11.46%

+3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.32%

14.65%

+3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

18.92%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.84%

21.03%

+0.81%

FTRI vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTRI vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF
2.10%2.35%4.29%6.56%8.37%6.58%3.64%6.25%4.24%3.60%2.96%0.89%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FTRI and RDVY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTRI has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.25% vs 10.05% for FTRI. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.

FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

FTRI is categorized as Natural Resources, while RDVY is Dividend. FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTRI and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer