FTRI vs. RDVY
FTRI (First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTRI is a Natural Resources fund tracking the Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTRI returned 10.05%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for RDVY. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTRI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.
Performance
FTRI vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRI has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 10.05%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.
FTRI
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- 11.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.41%
RDVY
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 30.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- 16.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $358.94K | $650.63K | $673.37K | |
| $77.65M | $79.19M | $83.63M |
FTRI vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 6.71% | 33.62% | -3.93% | 1.53% | 7.49% | 25.29% | -0.79% | 21.97% | -8.34% | 11.77% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 17.25% | 18.90% | 16.41% | 20.38% | -13.27% | 31.14% | 13.47% | 37.71% | -9.92% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRI and RDVY is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2015 | 0.59 |
The correlation between FTRI and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTRI vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTRI
RDVY
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
FTRI
RDVY
-
Utilities
FTRI
RDVY
Energy
FTRI
RDVY
Industrials
FTRI
RDVY
Consumer Defensive
FTRI
RDVY
Real Estate
FTRI
RDVY
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTRI
RDVY
Communication Services
FTRI
-
RDVY
Financial Services
FTRI
-
RDVY
Healthcare
FTRI
-
RDVY
Technology
FTRI
-
RDVY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTRI vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank
FTRI
RDVY
FTRI vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTRI | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.35 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 3.25 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.93 | 13.63 | -10.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTRI vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and RDVY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRI | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -40.60% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.04% | -9.04% | -8.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | -19.11% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | -25.32% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.82% | -40.60% | -3.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.51% | 0.00% | -12.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -4.95% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 2.15% | +4.66% |
Volatility
FTRI vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FTRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTRI | RDVY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.11% | 3.53% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.01% | 11.46% | +3.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.32% | 14.65% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.70% | 18.92% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.84% | 21.03% | +0.81% |
FTRI vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTRI vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison
FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 2.10% | 2.35% | 4.29% | 6.56% | 8.37% | 6.58% | 3.64% | 6.25% | 4.24% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 0.89% |
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF | 0.83% | 1.11% | 1.64% | 2.09% | 2.21% | 1.04% | 1.53% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.25% | 2.07% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTRI and RDVY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTRI has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs RDVY's -40.60%.
On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.25% vs 10.05% for FTRI. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.
FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.
FTRI is categorized as Natural Resources, while RDVY is Dividend. FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.47% for RDVY.
RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTRI and RDVY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer