FTRI vs. NANR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FTRI (First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF) and NANR (SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - FTRI tracks the Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index while NANR tracks the S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FTRI returned 10.43%/yr vs 12.52%/yr for NANR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTRI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NANR.

Performance

FTRI vs. NANR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than NANR's 24.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRI has underperformed NANR with an annualized return of 10.43%, while NANR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.52% annualized return.

FTRI

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 27.35%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 8.19%
• 10Y*: 10.43%

NANR

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 2.37%
• YTD: 24.07%
• 6M: 26.38%
• 1Y: 53.70%
• 3Y*: 20.80%
• 5Y*: 16.21%
• 10Y*: 12.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTRI vs. NANR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF	10.97%	33.62%	-3.93%	1.53%	7.49%	25.29%	-0.79%	21.97%	-8.34%	11.77%
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF	24.07%	35.35%	2.31%	-3.23%	26.49%	36.43%	1.03%	18.99%	-16.77%	8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FTRI and NANR is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2015	0.76

The correlation between FTRI and NANR shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.87 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTRI vs. NANR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTRI	NANR
Basic Materials	56.3%	47.1%
Utilities	16.1%	0.0%
Energy	15.9%	41.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	4.4%
Real Estate	3.5%	0.4%
Consumer Cyclical	3.4%	5.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.0%
Technology	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

FTRI vs. NANR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTRI

FTRI Risk / Return Rank: 43
FTRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
FTRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FTRI Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FTRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FTRI Martin Ratio Rank: 41

NANR

NANR Risk / Return Rank: 86
NANR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
NANR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
NANR Omega Ratio Rank: 81
NANR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
NANR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTRI vs. NANR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTRI	NANR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.98	-1.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	3.72	-1.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.49	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	6.04	-3.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	21.31	-14.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTRI vs. NANR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the NANR Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTRI and NANR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTRI	NANR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	2.98	-1.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.71	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.53	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.63	-0.15

Drawdowns

FTRI vs. NANR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, smaller than the maximum NANR drawdown of -49.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and NANR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTRI	NANR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.82%	-49.15%	+5.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	-8.93%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.25%	-18.42%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.51%	-26.42%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.82%	-49.15%	+5.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.02%	-2.35%	-6.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.47%	-8.40%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	2.53%	+1.61%

Volatility

FTRI vs. NANR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) at 4.92%. This indicates that FTRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NANR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTRI	NANR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	4.92%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.10%	14.38%	-0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.32%	18.13%	-0.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	22.89%	-2.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.03%	23.54%	-1.51%

FTRI vs. NANR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than NANR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTRI vs. NANR - Dividend Comparison

FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than NANR's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF	2.33%	2.35%	4.29%	6.56%	8.37%	6.58%	3.64%	6.25%	4.24%	3.60%	2.96%	0.89%
NANR SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF	1.69%	1.77%	2.20%	2.78%	2.70%	2.61%	2.73%	2.02%	1.95%	1.83%	5.01%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTRI and NANR in my portfolio?

FTRI and NANR have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTRI or NANR?

FTRI has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to NANR (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs NANR's -49.15%.

Which ETF is better, FTRI or NANR?

On 10-year performance, NANR leads with 12.52% vs 10.43% for FTRI. On fees, NANR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NANR has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTRI or NANR?

Over the 10-year period, NANR has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTRI or NANR?

NANR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTRI or NANR?

FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.69% for NANR.

What is the main difference between FTRI and NANR?

FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while NANR tracks S&P BMI North American Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.35% for NANR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NANR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.