FTRI vs. METL
FTRI (First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. FTRI is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTRI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
FTRI vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than METL's 18.34% return.
FTRI
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
METL
- 1D
- -3.81%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 18.34%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTRI vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 10.97% | 4.74% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 18.34% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRI and METL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTRI vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
FTRI
METL
FTRI vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTRI | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTRI | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.72 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
FTRI vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRI | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -27.39% | -16.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | -10.27% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -8.11% | -0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | — | — |
Volatility
FTRI vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTRI | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 43.94% | -26.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 43.94% | -23.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 43.94% | -21.91% |
FTRI vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTRI vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than METL's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 2.33% | 2.35% | 4.29% | 6.56% | 8.37% | 6.58% | 3.64% | 6.25% | 4.24% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 0.89% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTRI and METL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTRI is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTRI is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.84% for METL.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for FTRI and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer