FTRI vs. ICOP
FTRI (First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF) and ICOP (iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - FTRI tracks the Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index while ICOP tracks the STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FTRI returned 27.35% vs 102.60% for ICOP. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTRI charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ICOP.
Performance
FTRI vs. ICOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRI achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly lower than ICOP's 27.29% return.
FTRI
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 10.97%
- 6M
- 14.06%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
ICOP
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- 17.09%
- YTD
- 27.29%
- 6M
- 37.08%
- 1Y
- 102.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTRI vs. ICOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 10.97% | 33.62% | -3.93% | 8.68% |
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | 27.29% | 78.01% | 1.10% | 8.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRI and ICOP is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between FTRI and ICOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
FTRI vs. ICOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTRI
ICOP
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Basic Materials
FTRI
ICOP
Utilities
FTRI
ICOP
-
Energy
FTRI
ICOP
-
Consumer Defensive
FTRI
ICOP
-
Real Estate
FTRI
ICOP
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTRI
ICOP
-
Communication Services
FTRI
-
ICOP
-
Financial Services
FTRI
-
ICOP
-
Healthcare
FTRI
-
ICOP
-
Industrials
FTRI
-
ICOP
-
Technology
FTRI
-
ICOP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTRI vs. ICOP — Risk / Return Rank
FTRI
ICOP
FTRI vs. ICOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTRI | ICOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.59 | 2.77 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 3.11 | -1.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.42 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 3.95 | -1.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | 14.50 | -7.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTRI | ICOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.59 | 2.77 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.08 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
FTRI vs. ICOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRI drawdown since its inception was -43.82%, which is greater than ICOP's maximum drawdown of -38.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRI and ICOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRI | ICOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.82% | -38.67% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -26.13% | +14.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | -3.29% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -11.67% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 7.10% | -2.96% |
Volatility
FTRI vs. ICOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) is 5.54%, while iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF (ICOP) has a volatility of 13.69%. This indicates that FTRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTRI | ICOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 13.69% | -8.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 32.28% | -18.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 37.29% | -19.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.76% | 33.77% | -13.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 33.77% | -11.74% |
FTRI vs. ICOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOP's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTRI vs. ICOP - Dividend Comparison
FTRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than ICOP's 1.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRI First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF | 2.33% | 2.35% | 4.29% | 6.56% | 8.37% | 6.58% | 3.64% | 6.25% | 4.24% | 3.60% | 2.96% | 0.89% |
ICOP iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | 1.63% | 2.08% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTRI and ICOP have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOP has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to FTRI (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRI dropped -43.82% vs ICOP's -38.67%.
On 1-year performance, ICOP leads with 102.60% vs 27.35% for FTRI. On fees, ICOP is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FTRI has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ICOP has performed better with a 102.60% return vs 27.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICOP is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FTRI.
FTRI has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.63% for ICOP.
FTRI tracks Indxx Global Natural Resources Income Index, while ICOP tracks STOXX Global Copper and Metals Mining Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FTRI and 0.47% for ICOP.
ICOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTRI and ICOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer