FTRBX vs. WFBIX
FTRBX (Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares) and WFBIX (iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, FTRBX returned 2.19%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for WFBIX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FTRBX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for WFBIX.
Performance
FTRBX vs. WFBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRBX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than WFBIX's 0.10% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRBX has outperformed WFBIX with an annualized return of 2.19%, while WFBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.87% annualized return.
FTRBX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
WFBIX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
FTRBX vs. WFBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRBX Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares | -0.28% | 7.60% | 2.03% | 5.20% | -13.13% | -0.21% | 9.52% | 9.75% | -0.85% | 4.41% |
WFBIX iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund | 0.10% | 7.16% | 1.43% | 9.65% | -13.03% | -1.79% | 7.40% | 8.72% | -0.08% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRBX and WFBIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1996 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FTRBX and WFBIX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTRBX vs. WFBIX — Risk / Return Rank
FTRBX
WFBIX
FTRBX vs. WFBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) and iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTRBX | WFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.47 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | 4.11 | +0.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTRBX vs. WFBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRBX drawdown since its inception was -17.49%, smaller than the maximum WFBIX drawdown of -18.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRBX and WFBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRBX | WFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.49% | -18.68% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -3.02% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.21% | -6.09% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -17.84% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.49% | -18.68% | +1.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.51% | -1.82% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -2.26% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 1.08% | -0.13% |
Volatility
FTRBX vs. WFBIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund (WFBIX) at 1.17%. This indicates that FTRBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTRBX | WFBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.30% | 1.17% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 2.89% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.03% | 3.93% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 6.41% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.81% | 5.18% | -0.37% |
FTRBX vs. WFBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRBX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than WFBIX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTRBX vs. WFBIX - Dividend Comparison
FTRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than WFBIX's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRBX Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares | 4.56% | 4.52% | 4.47% | 3.84% | 2.47% | 3.43% | 4.66% | 3.38% | 3.49% | 3.21% | 3.35% | 3.53% |
WFBIX iShares U.S. Aggregate Bond Index Fund | 3.92% | 3.78% | 3.68% | 6.82% | 2.60% | 2.04% | 2.43% | 2.88% | 2.71% | 2.24% | 2.25% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTRBX and WFBIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTRBX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to WFBIX (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTRBX dropped -17.49% vs WFBIX's -18.68%.
FTRBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTRBX and WFBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer