FTRBX vs. VCIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT).
FTRBX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Oct 1, 1996. VCIT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009.
Performance
FTRBX vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTRBX vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRBX Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares | -0.95% | 7.60% | 2.03% | 5.20% | -13.13% | -0.21% | 9.52% | 9.75% | -0.85% | 4.41% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | -0.31% | 9.34% | 3.20% | 8.98% | -13.98% | -1.77% | 9.46% | 14.10% | -1.74% | 5.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTRBX achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than VCIT's -0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FTRBX has underperformed VCIT with an annualized return of 2.32%, while VCIT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.08% annualized return.
FTRBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -0.95%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 3.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 2.32%
VCIT
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.45%
- 10Y*
- 3.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FTRBX vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTRBX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FTRBX vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank
FTRBX
VCIT
FTRBX vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTRBX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.24 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.73 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.23 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 2.08 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.28 | 7.27 | -1.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTRBX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.24 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.22 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.49 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.76 | +0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTRBX and VCIT is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FTRBX vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison
FTRBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than VCIT's 4.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTRBX Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares | 4.20% | 4.52% | 4.47% | 3.84% | 2.47% | 3.43% | 4.66% | 3.38% | 3.49% | 3.21% | 3.35% | 3.53% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
FTRBX vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTRBX drawdown since its inception was -17.49%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTRBX and VCIT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTRBX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.49% | -20.56% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.80% | -2.99% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -20.56% | +3.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.49% | -20.56% | +3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -1.84% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.03% | -3.18% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.86% | +0.08% |
Volatility
FTRBX vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund Institutional Shares (FTRBX) is 1.36%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a volatility of 2.08%. This indicates that FTRBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTRBX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.36% | 2.08% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | 2.84% | -0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.57% | 4.85% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.85% | 6.60% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.78% | 6.27% | -1.49% |