PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTOH vs. USCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FTOH vs. USCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than USCI's 26.41% return.


FTOH

1D
0.12%
1M
1.06%
YTD
2.25%
6M
2.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USCI

1D
-1.41%
1M
-2.86%
YTD
26.41%
6M
24.03%
1Y
38.42%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
18.94%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTOH vs. USCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FTOH and USCI is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTOH vs. USCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTOH

USCI
USCI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
USCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
USCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTOH vs. USCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FTOH vs. USCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTOHUSCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

0.29

+0.92

Drawdowns

FTOH vs. USCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum USCI drawdown of -66.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and USCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTOHUSCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-66.41%

+63.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.46%

+4.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-29.50%

+28.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

Volatility

FTOH vs. USCI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTOHUSCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.64%

16.76%

-13.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.64%

18.44%

-14.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.64%

15.85%

-12.21%

FTOH vs. USCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USCI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FTOH vs. USCI - Dividend Comparison

FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, while USCI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTOH and USCI have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTOH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTOH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.

FTOH has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.00% for USCI.

FTOH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while USCI is Commodities. FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while USCI tracks SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity (TR). They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 1.03% for USCI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTOH and USCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer