FTOH vs. USAI
FTOH (Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF) and USAI (Pacer American Energy Independence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTOH is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while USAI is a Energy Equities fund tracking the American Energy Independence Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. FTOH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for USAI.
Performance
FTOH vs. USAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly lower than USAI's 26.20% return.
FTOH
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USAI
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 22.51%
- YTD
- 26.20%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 25.47%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- —
FTOH vs. USAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.49% | 0.08% |
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 26.20% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTOH and USAI is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTOH vs. USAI — Risk / Return Rank
FTOH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USAI
FTOH vs. USAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTOH | USAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTOH vs. USAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum USAI drawdown of -65.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and USAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTOH | USAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -65.25% | +62.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -2.89% | +2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -9.31% | +8.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.43% | — |
Volatility
FTOH vs. USAI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTOH | USAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 16.20% | -12.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.46% | 20.45% | -16.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.46% | 27.20% | -23.74% |
FTOH vs. USAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USAI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTOH vs. USAI - Dividend Comparison
FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than USAI's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.54% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 4.07% | 5.03% | 3.62% | 4.99% | 5.41% | 6.15% | 7.67% | 6.50% | 5.56% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTOH and USAI have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTOH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTOH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for USAI.
USAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.07%, compared with 2.54% for FTOH.
FTOH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while USAI is Energy Equities. FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while USAI tracks American Energy Independence Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.75% for USAI.
Find the right allocation for FTOH and USAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer