FTOH vs. FLIN
FTOH (Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTOH is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while FLIN is a India Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTOH charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.
Performance
FTOH vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTOH achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -8.24% return.
FTOH
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -8.24%
- 1Y
- -9.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FTOH vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.55% | 0.08% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -8.24% | 0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTOH and FLIN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTOH vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
FTOH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLIN
FTOH vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF (FTOH) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTOH | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTOH vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTOH drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTOH and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTOH | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -41.90% | +39.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -15.52% | +15.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -8.10% | +7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.91% | — |
Volatility
FTOH vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTOH | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.49% | 15.26% | -11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.49% | 15.80% | -12.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.49% | 20.39% | -16.90% |
FTOH vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTOH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTOH vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
FTOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than FLIN's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.43% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
FTOH Franklin Ohio Municipal Income ETF | 2.54% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTOH and FLIN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTOH.
FTOH has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.43% for FLIN.
FTOH is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while FLIN is India Equities. FTOH tracks Actively Managed, while FLIN tracks FTSE India RIC Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTOH and 0.19% for FLIN.
Find the right allocation for FTOH and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer