PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FTNT vs. ESOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FTNT vs. ESOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) and Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTNT achieves a 80.13% return, which is significantly lower than ESOA's 89.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FTNT has outperformed ESOA with an annualized return of 35.73%, while ESOA has yielded a comparatively lower 27.68% annualized return.


FTNT

1D
-1.13%
1M
25.40%
YTD
80.13%
6M
71.24%
1Y
36.31%
3Y*
28.12%
5Y*
25.96%
10Y*
35.73%

ESOA

1D
3.55%
1M
-10.75%
YTD
89.54%
6M
82.22%
1Y
42.15%
3Y*
91.64%
5Y*
49.24%
10Y*
27.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FTNT vs. ESOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.
80.13%-15.95%61.42%19.72%-31.98%141.97%39.13%51.58%61.20%45.05%
ESOA
Energy Services Of America Corp
89.54%-34.42%111.44%140.93%-22.02%223.53%32.47%-30.56%38.82%-36.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FTNT and ESOA is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2012

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTNT:

$106.25B

ESOA:

$271.43M

EPS

FTNT:

$2.58

ESOA:

$0.55

PE Ratio

FTNT:

55.54

ESOA:

28.25

PEG Ratio

FTNT:

1.54

ESOA:

0.65

PS Ratio

FTNT:

15.27

ESOA:

0.59

PB Ratio

FTNT:

107.36

ESOA:

3.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTNT:

$7.11B

ESOA:

$440.96M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTNT:

$5.74B

ESOA:

$52.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

FTNT:

$2.47B

ESOA:

$27.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FTNT vs. ESOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTNT
FTNT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FTNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTNT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FTNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTNT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ESOA
ESOA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ESOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESOA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ESOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESOA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTNT vs. ESOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) and Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FTNTESOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.36

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.73

2.75

-1.02

FTNT vs. ESOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the ESOA Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTNT and ESOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FTNTESOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

0.67

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.29

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.23

+0.51

Drawdowns

FTNT vs. ESOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTNT drawdown since its inception was -51.20%, smaller than the maximum ESOA drawdown of -76.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTNT and ESOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FTNTESOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.20%

-76.67%

+25.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.90%

-31.16%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.32%

-57.43%

+19.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.32%

-57.43%

+19.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.32%

-69.62%

+31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-19.03%

+14.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-33.05%

+16.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.06%

15.37%

+5.69%

Volatility

FTNT vs. ESOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) is 13.29%, while Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) has a volatility of 23.82%. This indicates that FTNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FTNTESOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.29%

23.82%

-10.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.80%

47.21%

-15.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.03%

63.12%

-18.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.89%

76.04%

-32.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.86%

96.13%

-55.27%

Dividends

FTNT vs. ESOA - Dividend Comparison

FTNT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESOA
Energy Services Of America Corp
0.78%1.47%0.24%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.49%0.00%5.88%
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FTNT vs. ESOA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortinet, Inc. and Energy Services Of America Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.85B
93.17M
(FTNT) Total Revenue
(ESOA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FTNT vs. ESOA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fortinet, Inc. and Energy Services Of America Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
80.3%
11.0%
Portfolio components
FTNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.3%.

ESOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 10.23M and revenue of 93.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.0%.

FTNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported an operating income of 580.00M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.4%.

ESOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 1.06M and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.

FTNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported a net income of 534.50M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.

ESOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 215.55K and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FTNT and ESOA have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESOA has higher volatility (23.82%) compared to FTNT (13.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTNT dropped -51.20% vs ESOA's -76.67%.

FTNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FTNT and ESOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer