FTNJ vs. RBIL
FTNJ (Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTNJ is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. FTNJ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
FTNJ vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTNJ achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.59% return.
FTNJ
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTNJ vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 1.93% | 0.34% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.59% | 0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTNJ and RBIL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTNJ vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
FTNJ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RBIL
FTNJ vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF (FTNJ) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTNJ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.10 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 30.11 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTNJ vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTNJ drawdown since its inception was -2.72%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTNJ and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTNJ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.72% | -0.56% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.24% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -0.08% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.13% | — |
Volatility
FTNJ vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTNJ | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 0.95% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 1.06% | +2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 1.06% | +2.11% |
FTNJ vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTNJ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTNJ vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
FTNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than RBIL's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FTNJ Franklin New Jersey Municipal Income ETF | 2.28% | 0.54% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.58% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTNJ and RBIL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for FTNJ.
RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 2.28% for FTNJ.
FTNJ is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. FTNJ tracks Actively Managed, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for FTNJ and 0.17% for RBIL.
Find the right allocation for FTNJ and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer